Strobbe Gregor, van Mierlo Pieter, De Vos Maarten, Mijović Bogdan, Hallez Hans, Van Huffel Sabine, López José David, Vandenberghe Stefaan
Ghent University - iMinds, Department of Electronics and Information Systems, MEDISIP, De Pintelaan 185, Building BB floor 5, 9000, Ghent, Belgium; iMinds Medical IT Department, Belgium.
University of Oldenburg, Methods in Neurocognitive Psychology, Department of Psychology, 26111 Oldenburg, Germany; University of Oldenburg, Research Center Neurosensory Science, 26111 Oldenburg, Germany; University of Oldenburg, Cluster of Excellence Hearing4all, 26111 Oldenburg, Germany.
Neuroimage. 2014 Oct 15;100:715-24. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.076. Epub 2014 Jul 8.
We revisit the multiple sparse priors (MSP) algorithm implemented in the statistical parametric mapping software (SPM) for distributed EEG source reconstruction (Friston et al., 2008). In the present implementation, multiple cortical patches are introduced as source priors based on a dipole source space restricted to a cortical surface mesh. In this note, we present a technique to construct volumetric cortical regions to introduce as source priors by restricting the dipole source space to a segmented gray matter layer and using a region growing approach. This extension allows to reconstruct brain structures besides the cortical surface and facilitates the use of more realistic volumetric head models including more layers, such as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), compared to the standard 3-layered scalp-skull-brain head models. We illustrated the technique with ERP data and anatomical MR images in 12 subjects. Based on the segmented gray matter for each of the subjects, cortical regions were created and introduced as source priors for MSP-inversion assuming two types of head models. The standard 3-layered scalp-skull-brain head models and extended 4-layered head models including CSF. We compared these models with the current implementation by assessing the free energy corresponding with each of the reconstructions using Bayesian model selection for group studies. Strong evidence was found in favor of the volumetric MSP approach compared to the MSP approach based on cortical patches for both types of head models. Overall, the strongest evidence was found in favor of the volumetric MSP reconstructions based on the extended head models including CSF. These results were verified by comparing the reconstructed activity. The use of volumetric cortical regions as source priors is a useful complement to the present implementation as it allows to introduce more complex head models and volumetric source priors in future studies.
我们重新审视了统计参数映射软件(SPM)中实现的用于分布式脑电图源重建的多重稀疏先验(MSP)算法(Friston等人,2008年)。在当前实现中,基于限于皮质表面网格的偶极子源空间,引入多个皮质斑块作为源先验。在本说明中,我们提出了一种技术,通过将偶极子源空间限制在分割的灰质层并使用区域生长方法来构建作为源先验引入的体积皮质区域。与标准的三层头皮-颅骨-脑头部模型相比,这种扩展允许除皮质表面之外重建脑结构,并便于使用包括更多层(如脑脊液(CSF))的更逼真的体积头部模型。我们用12名受试者的事件相关电位(ERP)数据和解剖磁共振图像说明了该技术。基于每个受试者的分割灰质,创建皮质区域并将其作为MSP反演的源先验引入,假设两种类型的头部模型。标准的三层头皮-颅骨-脑头部模型和包括CSF的扩展四层头部模型。我们通过使用贝叶斯模型选择进行组研究来评估与每个重建对应的自由能,将这些模型与当前实现进行比较。对于两种类型的头部模型,与基于皮质斑块的MSP方法相比,发现有力证据支持体积MSP方法。总体而言,发现最有力的证据支持基于包括CSF的扩展头部模型的体积MSP重建。通过比较重建活动验证了这些结果。使用体积皮质区域作为源先验是对当前实现的有用补充,因为它允许在未来研究中引入更复杂的头部模型和体积源先验。