• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低成本半硬性输尿管镜检查治疗输尿管结石疗效显著:单一大容量中心经验

Low-cost semirigid ureteroscopy is effective for ureteral stones: experience of a single high volume center.

作者信息

Giulianelli Roberto, Gentile Barbara Cristina, Vincenti Giorgio, Mavilla Luca, Albanesi Luca, Attisani Francesco, Mirabile Gabriella, Pisanti Francesco, Schettini Manlio

机构信息

Division of Urology, Nuova Villa Claudia, Rome.

出版信息

Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2014 Jun 30;86(2):118-22. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2014.2.118.

DOI:10.4081/aiua.2014.2.118
PMID:25017592
Abstract

AIM OF THE STUDY

To demonstrate how, in a center with a large number of patients, as our center is, it is possible to perform ureterolithotripsy using a limited set of instruments.

METHODS

We evaluated medical charts of our center related to semirigid ureteral ureteroscopy (URS) with ureterolithotripsy using Holmium laser performed from July 2004 to July 2011. Overall, 658 URS for ureteral stones were performed in 601 patients, of which 204 in proximal ureter (31%), 86 in the mid (13.06%) and 368 (57.76%) in the distal ureter. In 504 patients (76.5%) ureterohydronephrosis (Grade II-III) was observed. In 57 patients (8.6%), we performed a bilateral approach at the same time, but most patients had a solitary distal ureteral stone. 106 patients (16.1%) had more than one stone in their distal ureter and 96 (14.8%) had a proximal ureteral stone treated in the same surgery as well.

RESULTS

The overall stone-free rate for ureteral stones was 86.1% (567/658). Success rates for proximal, medial and distal ureteral stones were 68.13% (139/204 patients), 84.8% (73/86 patients) and 96.4% (355/368 patients), respectively. One hundred and twenty patients (18.3%) required additional surgical treatment for their stones beyond the initial URS, including a second URS in 97 patients (14.74%) and URS plus Retrograde Intra-Renal Surgery (RIRS) in 23 patients (3.54%). The overall stonefree rate after the second treatment was 99.3%. Intra-operative complications accounted for 5.92% and consisted of ureteral perforations in 16 pts (2.4%), erosions of urothelium leading to significant bleeding in 15 pts (2.27%), severe pain in 4 pts (0.6%), fever in 3 pts (0.45%) and one case of ureteral avulsion (0.15%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that the use of Holmium laser lithotripsy is a safe and effective means of treating ureteral stones regardless of sex, age, stone location, or stone size. The instrumentation we used was extremely limited, in order to reduce costs related to the procedure to an absolute minimum whilst maintaining the two quality indicators for the procedure, namely success rate and length of hospitalisation (86.1% and 34 hours).

摘要

研究目的

以我们这样拥有大量患者的中心为例,展示如何使用一套有限的器械进行输尿管结石碎石术。

方法

我们评估了2004年7月至2011年7月在我们中心进行的与使用钬激光进行输尿管镜下输尿管结石碎石术(URS)相关的病历。总体而言,601例患者共进行了658次输尿管结石URS,其中204次针对近端输尿管结石(31%),86次针对中段输尿管结石(13.06%),368次针对远端输尿管结石(57.76%)。504例患者(76.5%)存在输尿管肾积水(II - III级)。57例患者(8.6%)同时进行了双侧手术,但大多数患者为孤立性远端输尿管结石。106例患者(16.1%)远端输尿管有不止一枚结石,96例患者(14.8%)在同一手术中还治疗了近端输尿管结石。

结果

输尿管结石的总体结石清除率为86.1%(567/658)。近端、中段和远端输尿管结石的成功率分别为68.13%(139/204例患者)、84.8%(73/86例患者)和96.4%(355/368例患者)。120例患者(18.3%)在初次URS后需要额外的手术治疗结石,包括97例患者(14.74%)进行第二次URS,23例患者(3.54%)进行URS加逆行肾内手术(RIRS)。第二次治疗后的总体结石清除率为99.3%。术中并发症发生率为5.92%,包括16例患者输尿管穿孔(2.4%)、15例患者尿路上皮糜烂导致严重出血(2.27%)、4例患者严重疼痛(0.6%)、3例患者发热(0.45%)和1例输尿管撕脱(0.15%)。

结论

本研究表明,无论性别、年龄、结石位置或结石大小,使用钬激光碎石术都是治疗输尿管结石的一种安全有效的方法。我们使用的器械极为有限,目的是在保持手术成功率和住院时间这两个质量指标(分别为86.1%和34小时)的同时,将手术相关成本降至绝对最低。

相似文献

1
Low-cost semirigid ureteroscopy is effective for ureteral stones: experience of a single high volume center.低成本半硬性输尿管镜检查治疗输尿管结石疗效显著:单一大容量中心经验
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2014 Jun 30;86(2):118-22. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2014.2.118.
2
Shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral calculi (<20 mm): a comparative matched-pair study.冲击波碎石术与半硬性输尿管镜治疗近端输尿管结石(<20mm):一项配对对照研究
Urology. 2009 Jun;73(6):1184-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.12.064. Epub 2009 Apr 10.
3
Efficiency and cost of treating proximal ureteral stones: shock wave lithotripsy versus ureteroscopy plus holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser.治疗近端输尿管结石的效率与成本:冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜检查联合钬:钇铝石榴石激光治疗的比较
Urology. 2004 Dec;64(6):1102-6; discussion 1106. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.07.040.
4
Treatment of ureteral calculi with semirigid ureteroscopy: where should we stop?半硬性输尿管镜治疗输尿管结石:我们该止步于何处?
Urol Int. 2010;84(3):260-4. doi: 10.1159/000288225. Epub 2010 Apr 13.
5
Comparison between extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and semirigid ureterorenoscope with holmium:YAG laser lithotripsy for treating large proximal ureteral stones.体外冲击波碎石术与钬激光联合半硬性输尿管肾镜治疗近端输尿管大结石的比较。
J Urol. 2004 Nov;172(5 Pt 1):1899-902. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000142848.43880.b3.
6
Cost-effectiveness of anti-retropulsive devices varies according to the locations of proximal ureteral stones: a retrospective cohort study.抗反流装置的成本效益因近端输尿管结石的位置而异:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Urol. 2022 Mar 24;22(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-00995-9.
7
Therapeutic options for proximal ureter stone: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy versus semirigid ureterorenoscope with holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser lithotripsy.近端输尿管结石的治疗选择:体外冲击波碎石术与带有钬:钇铝石榴石激光碎石术的半硬性输尿管肾镜检查术对比
Urology. 2005 Jun;65(6):1075-9. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.12.026.
8
Extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy compared with ureteroscopy for the removal of small distal ureteral stones.体外冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜检查治疗远端输尿管小结石的比较
Urol Int. 2004;73(3):238-43. doi: 10.1159/000080834.
9
A prospective randomized comparison between shockwave lithotripsy and semirigid ureteroscopy for upper ureteral stones <2 cm: a single center experience.冲击波碎石术与半硬性输尿管镜治疗小于2厘米上段输尿管结石的前瞻性随机对照研究:单中心经验
J Endourol. 2015 Jan;29(1):47-51. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0493.
10
Efficacy of semirigid ureteroscopy with pneumatic lithotripsy for ureteral stone surface area of greater than 30 mm2.半硬性输尿管镜联合气压弹道碎石术治疗结石表面积大于30 mm²的输尿管结石的疗效
J Endourol. 2009 Apr;23(4):619-22. doi: 10.1089/end.2008.0182.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of Semirigid Ureteroscopy Combined with Holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet Laser Lithotripsy for the Treatment of Proximal Ureteral Calculi: A Single-arm Meta-analysis.半硬性输尿管镜联合钬激光碎石术治疗近端输尿管结石的疗效及安全性:单臂荟萃分析
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024 Oct 25;70:124-134. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.10.006. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Cost-effectiveness of using stone cone, balloon dilator, stone basket, and entrapment device in ureteroscopic laser lithotripsy for ureteric stones.输尿管镜激光碎石术治疗输尿管结石中使用石锥、球囊扩张器、取石篮和套石篮的成本效果分析。
J Int Med Res. 2021 Dec;49(12):3000605211061043. doi: 10.1177/03000605211061043.
3
Endoscopic Management of Ureteric Stones: Our Initial Experience.
输尿管结石的内镜治疗:我们的初步经验
Niger J Surg. 2019 Jan-Jun;25(1):26-29. doi: 10.4103/njs.NJS_20_18.