Botzet Andria M, McIlvaine Patrick W, Winters Ken C, Fahnhorst Tamara, Dittel Christine
University of Minnesota Medical School.
Peabody J Educ. 2014;89(2):197-213. doi: 10.1080/0161956X.2014.895648.
Accurate evaluation and documentation of the efficacy of recovery schools can be vital to the continuation and expansion of these beneficial resources. A very limited data set currently exists that examines the value of specific schools established to support adolescents and young adults in recovery; additional research is necessary. The following article outlines the methodology utilized in a current quasi-experimental study evaluating both academic and therapeutic outcomes of adolescents attending recovery high schools as compared to traditional (non-recovery-based) high schools. The developmental considerations in assessing adolescents in recovery and their parents is delineated in this article, which underscores the need for extensive knowledge of adolescent substance abuse and other mental health issues. In addition, sensitivity around privacy among adolescents, parents, schools, and health providers is highlighted, as well as the validity of assessment. Key assessment strategies, including protocol of recruitment and interviewing techniques, are also presented along with a list of parent and adolescent assessment instruments and their corresponding interpretive variables. Protocol recommendations for future research are also outlined.
准确评估和记录康复学校的成效对于这些有益资源的持续和扩展至关重要。目前存在的数据集非常有限,这些数据集研究了为支持处于康复期的青少年和青年而设立的特定学校的价值;还需要进行更多研究。以下文章概述了当前一项准实验研究中所采用的方法,该研究评估了就读于康复高中的青少年与传统(非康复型)高中的青少年在学业和治疗方面的成果。本文阐述了在评估处于康复期的青少年及其父母时的发展性考量,强调了对青少年药物滥用和其他心理健康问题有广泛了解的必要性。此外,还强调了青少年、父母、学校和医疗服务提供者之间在隐私方面的敏感性以及评估的有效性。还介绍了关键评估策略,包括招募方案和访谈技巧,以及一份父母和青少年评估工具清单及其相应的解释变量。同时还概述了未来研究的方案建议。