Department of Surgery, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Washington.
JAMA Surg. 2014 Sep;149(9):904-12. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.940.
Analysis of combat deaths provides invaluable epidemiologic and quality-improvement data for trauma centers and is particularly important under rapidly evolving battlefield conditions.
To analyze the evolution of injury patterns, early care, and resuscitation among patients who subsequently died in the hospital, before and after implementation of damage control resuscitation (DCR) policies.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: In a review of the Joint Theater Trauma Registry (2002-2011) of US forward combat hospitals, cohorts of patients with vital signs at presentation and subsequent in-hospital death were grouped into 2 time periods: pre-DCR (before 2006) and DCR (2006-2011).
Injury types and Injury Severity Scores (ISSs), timing and location of death, and initial (24-hour) and total volume of blood products and fluid administered.
Of 57,179 soldiers admitted to a forward combat hospital, 2565 (4.5%) subsequently died in the hospital. The majority of patients (74%) were severely injured (ISS > 15), and 80% died within 24 hours of admission. Damage control resuscitation policies were widely implemented by 2006 and resulted in a decrease in mean 24-hour crystalloid infusion volume (6.1-3.2 L) and increased fresh frozen plasma use (3.2-10.1 U) (both P < .05) in this population. The mean packed red blood cells to fresh frozen plasma ratio changed from 2.6:1 during the pre-DCR period to 1.4:1 during the DCR period (P < .01). There was a significant increase in mean ISS between cohorts (pre-DCR ISS = 23 vs DCR ISS = 27; P < .05) and a marked shift in injury patterns favoring more severe head trauma in the DCR cohort.
There has been a significant shift in resuscitation practices in forward combat hospitals indicating widespread military adoption of DCR. Patients who died in a hospital during the DCR period were more likely to be severely injured and have a severe brain injury, consistent with a decrease in deaths among potentially salvageable patients.
对战斗死亡进行分析可为创伤中心提供宝贵的流行病学和质量改进数据,在迅速变化的战场条件下尤其重要。
分析在实施损伤控制性复苏 (DCR) 政策前后,在医院随后死亡的患者的损伤模式、早期护理和复苏演变。
设计、环境和参与者:在对美国前沿作战医院的联合战区创伤登记处 (2002-2011 年) 的审查中,将有生命体征表现且随后在医院内死亡的患者队列分为 2 个时间段:DCR 前 (2006 年前) 和 DCR (2006-2011 年)。
损伤类型和损伤严重程度评分 (ISS)、死亡的时间和地点,以及初始 (24 小时) 和总输血量和液体量。
在被收治到前沿作战医院的 57179 名士兵中,有 2565 名 (4.5%) 随后在医院死亡。大多数患者 (74%) 伤势严重 (ISS > 15),80%在入院后 24 小时内死亡。DCR 政策在 2006 年得到广泛实施,导致该人群中平均 24 小时晶体液输注量减少 (6.1-3.2 L),新鲜冷冻血浆使用量增加 (3.2-10.1 U) (均 P <.05)。在 DCR 期间,浓缩红细胞与新鲜冷冻血浆的比值从 DCR 前的 2.6:1 变为 1.4:1 (P <.01)。两个队列之间的平均 ISS 显著增加 (DCR 前 ISS=23 与 DCR ISS=27;P <.05),损伤模式明显偏向 DCR 队列中更严重的头部创伤。
前沿作战医院的复苏实践发生了重大转变,表明 DCR 在军队中的广泛采用。在 DCR 期间在医院死亡的患者更有可能受重伤和严重脑损伤,这与可能挽救的患者死亡人数减少相一致。