Nakazawa Hisato, Mori Yoshimasa, Yamamuro Osamu, Komori Masataka, Shibamoto Yuta, Uchiyama Yukio, Tsugawa Takahiko, Hagiwara Masahiro
Department of Radiological Sciences, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan Nagoya Radiosurgery Center, Nagoya Kyoritsu Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
J Radiat Res. 2014 Nov;55(6):1184-91. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rru064. Epub 2014 Jul 17.
We assessed the geometric distortion of 1.5-Tesla (T) and 3.0-T magnetic resonance (MR) images with the Leksell skull frame system using three types of cranial quick fixation screws (QFSs) of different materials-aluminum, aluminum with tungsten tip, and titanium-for skull frame fixation. Two kinds of acrylic phantoms were placed on a Leksell skull frame using the three types of screws, and were scanned with computed tomography (CT), 1.5-T MR imaging and 3.0-T MR imaging. The 3D coordinates for both strengths of MR imaging were compared with those for CT. The deviations of the measured coordinates at selected points (x = 50, 100 and 150; y = 50, 100 and 150) were indicated on different axial planes (z = 50, 75, 100, 125 and 150). The errors of coordinates with QFSs of aluminum, tungsten-tipped aluminum, and titanium were <1.0, 1.0 and 2.0 mm in the entire treatable area, respectively, with 1.5 T. In the 3.0-T field, the errors with aluminum QFSs were <1.0 mm only around the center, while the errors with tungsten-tipped aluminum and titanium were >2.0 mm in most positions. The geometric accuracy of the Leksell skull frame system with 1.5-T MR imaging was high and valid for clinical use. However, the geometric errors with 3.0-T MR imaging were larger than those of 1.5-T MR imaging and were acceptable only with aluminum QFSs, and then only around the central region.
我们使用三种不同材料(铝、钨尖铝和钛)的颅骨快速固定螺钉(QFS),通过Leksell头架系统评估了1.5特斯拉(T)和3.0-T磁共振(MR)图像的几何畸变,这些螺钉用于头架固定。使用这三种螺钉将两种丙烯酸模型放置在Leksell头架上,并进行计算机断层扫描(CT)、1.5-T MR成像和3.0-T MR成像扫描。将两种强度MR成像的三维坐标与CT的三维坐标进行比较。在不同轴向平面(z = 50、75、100、125和150)上显示选定各点(x = 50、100和150;y = 50、100和150)处测量坐标的偏差。在1.5 T时,整个可治疗区域内,铝质、钨尖铝质和钛质QFS的坐标误差分别<1.0、1.0和2.0 mm。在3.0-T场中,铝质QFS仅在中心附近误差<1.0 mm,而钨尖铝质和钛质QFS在大多数位置误差>2.0 mm。1.5-T MR成像时Leksell头架系统的几何精度较高,可用于临床。然而,3.0-T MR成像时的几何误差大于1.5-T MR成像,仅铝质QFS在中心区域附近误差可接受。