Suppr超能文献

1.5特斯拉和3.0特斯拉磁共振成像中Leksell立体定向头架三维坐标的几何精度:三种不同固定螺钉材料的比较

Geometric accuracy of 3D coordinates of the Leksell stereotactic skull frame in 1.5 Tesla- and 3.0 Tesla-magnetic resonance imaging: a comparison of three different fixation screw materials.

作者信息

Nakazawa Hisato, Mori Yoshimasa, Yamamuro Osamu, Komori Masataka, Shibamoto Yuta, Uchiyama Yukio, Tsugawa Takahiko, Hagiwara Masahiro

机构信息

Department of Radiological Sciences, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan Nagoya Radiosurgery Center, Nagoya Kyoritsu Hospital, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan

Department of Radiology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.

出版信息

J Radiat Res. 2014 Nov;55(6):1184-91. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rru064. Epub 2014 Jul 17.

Abstract

We assessed the geometric distortion of 1.5-Tesla (T) and 3.0-T magnetic resonance (MR) images with the Leksell skull frame system using three types of cranial quick fixation screws (QFSs) of different materials-aluminum, aluminum with tungsten tip, and titanium-for skull frame fixation. Two kinds of acrylic phantoms were placed on a Leksell skull frame using the three types of screws, and were scanned with computed tomography (CT), 1.5-T MR imaging and 3.0-T MR imaging. The 3D coordinates for both strengths of MR imaging were compared with those for CT. The deviations of the measured coordinates at selected points (x = 50, 100 and 150; y = 50, 100 and 150) were indicated on different axial planes (z = 50, 75, 100, 125 and 150). The errors of coordinates with QFSs of aluminum, tungsten-tipped aluminum, and titanium were <1.0, 1.0 and 2.0 mm in the entire treatable area, respectively, with 1.5 T. In the 3.0-T field, the errors with aluminum QFSs were <1.0 mm only around the center, while the errors with tungsten-tipped aluminum and titanium were >2.0 mm in most positions. The geometric accuracy of the Leksell skull frame system with 1.5-T MR imaging was high and valid for clinical use. However, the geometric errors with 3.0-T MR imaging were larger than those of 1.5-T MR imaging and were acceptable only with aluminum QFSs, and then only around the central region.

摘要

我们使用三种不同材料(铝、钨尖铝和钛)的颅骨快速固定螺钉(QFS),通过Leksell头架系统评估了1.5特斯拉(T)和3.0-T磁共振(MR)图像的几何畸变,这些螺钉用于头架固定。使用这三种螺钉将两种丙烯酸模型放置在Leksell头架上,并进行计算机断层扫描(CT)、1.5-T MR成像和3.0-T MR成像扫描。将两种强度MR成像的三维坐标与CT的三维坐标进行比较。在不同轴向平面(z = 50、75、100、125和150)上显示选定各点(x = 50、100和150;y = 50、100和150)处测量坐标的偏差。在1.5 T时,整个可治疗区域内,铝质、钨尖铝质和钛质QFS的坐标误差分别<1.0、1.0和2.0 mm。在3.0-T场中,铝质QFS仅在中心附近误差<1.0 mm,而钨尖铝质和钛质QFS在大多数位置误差>2.0 mm。1.5-T MR成像时Leksell头架系统的几何精度较高,可用于临床。然而,3.0-T MR成像时的几何误差大于1.5-T MR成像,仅铝质QFS在中心区域附近误差可接受。

相似文献

2
4
Characterization of system-related geometric distortions in MR images employed in Gamma Knife radiosurgery applications.
Phys Med Biol. 2016 Oct 7;61(19):6993-7011. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/19/6993. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
10
Geometrical accuracy of a 3-tesla magnetic resonance imaging unit in Gamma Knife surgery.
J Neurosurg. 2006 Dec;105 Suppl:190-3. doi: 10.3171/sup.2006.105.7.190.

引用本文的文献

1
Relationship between imaging parameters and distortion in magnetic resonance images for gamma knife treatment planning.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023 Dec;24(12):e14205. doi: 10.1002/acm2.14205. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
3
Stereotactic Neuro-Navigation Phantom Designs: A Systematic Review.
Front Neurorobot. 2020 Oct 23;14:549603. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2020.549603. eCollection 2020.
4
Stereotactic accuracy and frame mounting: A phantom study.
Surg Neurol Int. 2019 Apr 24;10:67. doi: 10.25259/SNI-88-2019. eCollection 2019.
7
Evaluation of the stability of the stereotactic Leksell Frame G in Gamma Knife radiosurgery.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016 May 8;17(3):75-89. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v17i3.5944.

本文引用的文献

4
Mechanisms and prevention of thermal injury from gamma radiosurgery headframes during 3T MR imaging.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2012 Jul 5;13(4):3613. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v13i4.3613.
5
Three dimensional comparative measurement of polyurethane milled skull models based on CT and MRI data sets.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012 Dec;40(8):e419-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2012.02.019. Epub 2012 Apr 15.
7
Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography scans on 1.5, 3, and 7 Tesla units: a quantitative study of 3-dimensional cerebrovasculature.
J Neuroimaging. 2013 Jan;23(1):86-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1552-6569.2011.00597.x. Epub 2011 Mar 29.
8
Development of a geometrically accurate imaging protocol at 3 Tesla MRI for stereotactic radiosurgery treatment planning.
Phys Med Biol. 2010 Nov 21;55(22):6601-15. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/22/002. Epub 2010 Oct 20.
9
Clinical evaluation of stereotactic target localization using 3-Tesla MRI for radiosurgery planning.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Apr;76(5):1472-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.03.020. Epub 2009 Jun 8.
10
Geometrical accuracy of a 3-tesla magnetic resonance imaging unit in Gamma Knife surgery.
J Neurosurg. 2006 Dec;105 Suppl:190-3. doi: 10.3171/sup.2006.105.7.190.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验