Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States.
Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States; Musculoskeletal Research Laboratories, Department of Veterans Affairs, Palo Alto, CA, United States.
Gait Posture. 2014 Sep;40(4):526-31. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.06.010. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
The purpose of this study was to determine the presence and prevalence of asymmetry in lower extremity joint moments within and across healthy populations during overground walking. Bilateral gait data from several studies performed at two institutions were pooled from 182 healthy, pain-free subjects. Four distinct populations were identified based on age, activity level and body mass index. Mean peak external joint moments were calculated from three to six trials of level overground walking at self-selected speed for each subject. Right and left limb moments were reclassified as "greater" or "lesser" moment for each subject to prevent obscuring absolute asymmetry due to averaging over positive and negative asymmetries across subjects. A clinically relevant asymmetry measure was calculated from the peak joint moments with an initial chosen cutoff value of 10%. Confidence intervals for the proportion of subjects with greater than 10% asymmetry between limbs were estimated based on the binomial distribution. We found a high amount of asymmetry between the limbs in healthy populations. More than half of our overall population exceeded 10% asymmetry in peak hip and knee flexion and adduction moments. Group medians exceeded 10% asymmetry for all variables in all populations. This may have important implications on gait evaluations, particularly clinical evaluations or research studies where asymmetry is used as an outcome. Additional research is necessary to determine acceptable levels of joint moment asymmetry during gait and to determine whether asymmetrical joint moments influence the development of symptomatic pathology or success of lower extremity rehabilitation.
本研究旨在确定在正常人群中,地面行走时下肢关节力矩是否存在且是否存在不对称性。从两个机构进行的几项研究中汇集了 182 名健康、无痛的受试者的双侧步态数据。根据年龄、活动水平和体重指数确定了四个不同的人群。为每个受试者计算了从三个到六个自我选择速度的水平地面行走试验的平均峰值外部关节力矩。为了防止由于跨受试者的正和负不对称性平均而掩盖绝对不对称性,将左右肢体力矩重新分类为“更大”或“更小”力矩。从峰值关节力矩计算出一个具有 10%初始选择截止值的临床相关不对称性度量。根据二项式分布,估计了具有肢体之间超过 10%不对称性的受试者比例的置信区间。我们发现健康人群中存在大量的肢体不对称性。超过一半的总体人群在峰值髋关节和膝关节屈曲和内收力矩中超过 10%的不对称性。在所有人群中,所有变量的组中位数均超过 10%的不对称性。这可能对步态评估,特别是作为结果使用不对称性的临床评估或研究有重要影响。需要进一步的研究来确定步态期间关节力矩不对称的可接受水平,并确定不对称的关节力矩是否会影响症状性病理的发展或下肢康复的成功。