Traxler M, Fezoulidis J, Schadelbauer E, Reichsthaler J
Central Institute for Radiodiagnosis, University of Vienna, Austria.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1989 Jun;18(3):184-6. doi: 10.1016/s0901-5027(89)80123-7.
The results of clinical examination, orthopantomographic examination and computed tomography were compared in 55 patients with impacted teeth. The results of computed tomography and orthopantomograms were equally good. Both methods were superior to clinical examination. With regard to the detection of displacement, contact and resorption, computed tomography was superior to both clinical examination and orthopantomograms.
对55例阻生牙患者的临床检查、全景X线检查和计算机断层扫描结果进行了比较。计算机断层扫描和全景X线片的结果同样良好。两种方法均优于临床检查。在检测移位、接触和吸收方面，计算机断层扫描优于临床检查和全景X线片。
