From the Department of Pharmacology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4R2, Canada.
From the Department of Pharmacology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia B3H 4R2, Canada
J Biol Chem. 2014 Sep 5;289(36):24845-62. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.557025. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
Modulation of type 1 cannabinoid receptor (CB1) activity has been touted as a potential means of treating addiction, anxiety, depression, and neurodegeneration. Different agonists of CB1 are known to evoke varied responses in vivo. Functional selectivity is the ligand-specific activation of certain signal transduction pathways at a receptor that can signal through multiple pathways. To understand cannabinoid-specific functional selectivity, different groups have examined the effect of individual cannabinoids on various signaling pathways in heterologous expression systems. In the current study, we compared the functional selectivity of six cannabinoids, including two endocannabinoids (2-arachidonyl glycerol (2-AG) and anandamide (AEA)), two synthetic cannabinoids (WIN55,212-2 and CP55,940), and two phytocannabinoids (cannabidiol (CBD) and Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)) on arrestin2-, Gα(i/o)-, Gβγ-, Gα(s)-, and Gα(q)-mediated intracellular signaling in the mouse STHdh(Q7/Q7) cell culture model of striatal medium spiny projection neurons that endogenously express CB1. In this system, 2-AG, THC, and CP55,940 were more potent mediators of arrestin2 recruitment than other cannabinoids tested. 2-AG, AEA, and WIN55,212-2, enhanced Gα(i/o) and Gβγ signaling, with 2-AG and AEA treatment leading to increased total CB1 levels. 2-AG, AEA, THC, and WIN55,212-2 also activated Gα(q)-dependent pathways. CP55,940 and CBD both signaled through Gα(s). CP55,940, but not CBD, activated downstream Gα(s) pathways via CB1 targets. THC and CP55,940 promoted CB1 internalization and decreased CB1 protein levels over an 18-h period. These data demonstrate that individual cannabinoids display functional selectivity at CB1 leading to activation of distinct signaling pathways. To effectively match cannabinoids with therapeutic goals, these compounds must be screened for their signaling bias.
调节 1 型大麻素受体 (CB1) 的活性被吹捧为治疗成瘾、焦虑、抑郁和神经退行性变的潜在手段。已知不同的 CB1 激动剂在体内会引起不同的反应。功能选择性是指配体特异性激活受体的某些信号转导途径,这些途径可以通过多种途径发出信号。为了了解大麻素的特异性功能选择性,不同的研究小组已经在异源表达系统中检查了单个大麻素对各种信号通路的影响。在本研究中,我们比较了六种大麻素的功能选择性,包括两种内源性大麻素(2-花生四烯酸甘油(2-AG)和大麻素(AEA))、两种合成大麻素(WIN55,212-2 和 CP55,940)和两种植物大麻素(大麻二酚(CBD)和 Δ(9)-四氢大麻酚(THC))在表达 CB1 的纹状体中间投射神经元小鼠 STHdh(Q7/Q7)细胞培养模型中对 arrestin2-、Gα(i/o)-、Gβγ-、Gα(s)-和 Gα(q)-介导的细胞内信号的影响。在这个系统中,2-AG、THC 和 CP55,940 比其他测试的大麻素更有效地募集 arrestin2。2-AG、AEA 和 WIN55,212-2 增强了 Gα(i/o)和 Gβγ信号,2-AG 和 AEA 处理导致总 CB1 水平增加。2-AG、AEA、THC 和 WIN55,212-2 也激活了 Gα(q)-依赖性途径。CP55,940 和 CBD 都通过 Gα(s)发出信号。CP55,940 但不是 CBD 通过 CB1 靶点激活下游 Gα(s)途径。THC 和 CP55,940 在 18 小时内促进 CB1 内化并降低 CB1 蛋白水平。这些数据表明,个体大麻素在 CB1 上表现出功能选择性,导致不同信号通路的激活。为了有效地将大麻素与治疗目标相匹配,必须对这些化合物进行信号偏向性筛选。