Have we asked too much of consent?
作者信息
Koenig Barbara A
出版信息
Hastings Cent Rep. 2014 Jul-Aug;44(4):33-4. doi: 10.1002/hast.329.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Have we asked too much of consent?
Hastings Cent Rep. 2014 Jul-Aug;44(4):33-4. doi: 10.1002/hast.329.
2
Support for full disclosure up front.
Hastings Cent Rep. 2015 Jan-Feb;45(1):3. doi: 10.1002/hast.406.
3
The authors reply.
Hastings Cent Rep. 2015 Jan-Feb;45(1):4. doi: 10.1002/hast.408.
4
Models of consent to return of incidental findings in genomic research.
Hastings Cent Rep. 2014 Jul-Aug;44(4):22-32. doi: 10.1002/hast.328. Epub 2014 Jun 11.
5
Ethical issues in rare diseases.
Dev Period Med. 2015 Oct-Dec;19(4):533-5.
6
A closer look revisited: are we subjects or are we donors?
Genet Med. 2012 Apr;14(4):458-60. doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.6. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
7
Managing the ethical challenges of next-generation sequencing in genomic medicine.
Br Med Bull. 2014 Sep;111(1):17-30. doi: 10.1093/bmb/ldu017. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
8
Ethics. Incidental findings in brain imaging research.
Science. 2006 Feb 10;311(5762):783-4. doi: 10.1126/science.1124665.
9
Secrets of the human genome disclosed.
Nature. 2011 Oct 4;478(7367):17. doi: 10.1038/478017a.
10
Individual genetic and genomic research results and the tradition of informed consent: exploring US review board guidance.
J Med Ethics. 2012 Jul;38(7):417-22. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100273. Epub 2012 Mar 5.
引用本文的文献
1
Opportunities for a national genomic data governance framework in Australia: a systematic review.
BMC Med Ethics. 2025 Aug 14;26(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12910-025-01273-7.
2
Conceptualizing the public good for genomics in the global South: a cross-disciplinary roundtable dialogue.
Front Genet. 2025 Jul 2;16:1523396. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2025.1523396. eCollection 2025.
3
Experiences and preferences for learning about neonatal research: insights from parent interviews.
J Perinatol. 2024 Mar;44(3):404-414. doi: 10.1038/s41372-023-01790-6. Epub 2023 Nov 25.
4
Exploring how biobanks communicate the possibility of commercial access and its associated benefits and risks in participant documents.
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Sep 21;23(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00829-1.
5
"If relatives inherited the gene, they should inherit the data." Bringing the family into the room where bioethics happens.
New Genet Soc. 2022;41(1):23-46. doi: 10.1080/14636778.2021.2007065. Epub 2021 Dec 13.
6
Post-trial access in implanted neural device research: Device maintenance, abandonment, and cost.
Brain Stimul. 2022 Sep-Oct;15(5):1029-1036. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2022.07.051. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
7
Appropriate Safeguards and Article 89 of the GDPR: Considerations for Biobank, Databank and Genetic Research.
Front Genet. 2022 Feb 18;13:719317. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.719317. eCollection 2022.
8
What can data trusts for health research learn from participatory governance in biobanks?
J Med Ethics. 2022 May;48(5):323-328. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2020-107020. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
9
Alignment between expectations and experiences of egg donors: what does it mean to be informed?
Reprod Biomed Soc Online. 2020 Sep 19;12:1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.rbms.2020.08.003. eCollection 2021 Mar.
10
Informed Consent in the Genomics Era.
Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2020 Aug 3;10(8):a036582. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a036582.
本文引用的文献
1
The Mayo Clinic Biobank: a building block for individualized medicine.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2013 Sep;88(9):952-62. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.06.006.
2
Fixing research subjects protection in the United States: moving beyond consent.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2013 May;88(5):428-30. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.03.010.
3
Is informed consent broken?
Am J Med Sci. 2011 Oct;342(4):267-72. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e31822a6c47.
4
From consent to institutions: designing adaptive governance for genomic biobanks.
Soc Sci Med. 2011 Aug;73(3):367-74. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.05.046. Epub 2011 Jul 2.
Zotero 插件