Porta Camillo, Levy Antonin, Hawkins Robert, Castellano Daniel, Bellmunt Joaquim, Nathan Paul, McDermott Ray, Wagstaff John, Donnellan Paul, McCaffrey John, Vekeman Francis, Neary Maureen P, Diaz Jose, Mehmud Faisal, Duh Mei Sheng
IRCCS San Matteo University Hospital Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
Cancer Med. 2014 Dec;3(6):1517-26. doi: 10.1002/cam4.302. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
Angiogenesis inhibitors have become standard of care for advanced and/or metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC), but data on the impact of adverse events (AEs) and treatment modifications associated with these agents are limited. Medical records were abstracted at 10 tertiary oncology centers in Europe for 291 patients ≥ 18 years old treated with sunitinib as first-line treatment for advanced RCC (no prior systemic treatment for advanced disease). Logistic regression models were estimated to compare dose intensity among patients who did and did not experience AEs during the landmark periods (18, 24, and 30 weeks). Cox proportional hazard models were used to explore the possible relationship of low-dose intensity (defined using thresholds of 0.7, 0.8, and 0.9) and treatment modifications during the landmark periods to survival. 64.4% to 67.9% of patients treated with sunitinib reported at least one AE of any grade, and approximately 10% of patients experienced at least one severe (grade 3 or 4) AE. Patients reporting severe AEs were statistically significantly more likely to have dose intensities below either 0.8 or 0.9. Dose intensity below 0.7 and dose discontinuation during all landmark periods were statistically significantly associated with shorter survival time. This study of advanced RCC patients treated with sunitinib in Europe found a significant relationship between AEs and dose intensity. It also found correlations between dose intensity and shorter survival, and between dose discontinuation and shorter survival. These results confirm the importance of tolerable treatment and maintaining dose intensity.
血管生成抑制剂已成为晚期和/或转移性肾细胞癌(RCC)的标准治疗方法,但关于这些药物相关不良事件(AE)和治疗调整影响的数据有限。在欧洲的10家三级肿瘤中心提取了291例年龄≥18岁的患者的病历,这些患者接受舒尼替尼作为晚期RCC的一线治疗(既往未接受过晚期疾病的全身治疗)。估计采用逻辑回归模型比较在标志性时期(18、24和30周)经历和未经历AE的患者之间的剂量强度。采用Cox比例风险模型探讨标志性时期低剂量强度(使用0.7、0.8和0.9的阈值定义)和治疗调整与生存的可能关系。接受舒尼替尼治疗的患者中有64.4%至67.9%报告了至少一种任何级别的AE,约10%的患者经历了至少一种严重(3级或4级)AE。报告严重AE的患者在统计学上更有可能出现低于0.8或0.9的剂量强度。在所有标志性时期,低于0.7的剂量强度和停药在统计学上与较短生存时间显著相关。这项对欧洲接受舒尼替尼治疗的晚期RCC患者的研究发现AE与剂量强度之间存在显著关系。还发现剂量强度与较短生存之间以及停药与较短生存之间存在相关性。这些结果证实了可耐受治疗和维持剂量强度的重要性。