• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床实践中转移性肾细胞癌血管生成抑制剂治疗相关成本:来自病历回顾研究的结果。

Costs associated with angiogenesis inhibitor therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in clinical practice: results from a medical chart review study.

机构信息

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA.

出版信息

Urol Oncol. 2012 Nov-Dec;30(6):848-55. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.07.009. Epub 2010 Oct 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.07.009
PMID:20926319
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To estimate costs for treatment of mRCC patients receiving angiogenesis inhibitors (AI) using resource utilization data from medical charts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed in two U.S. tertiary oncology centers. Non-trial mRCC patients treated from 04/2003 to 06/2008, ≥ 18 years old, and with ≥ 1 prescription for sunitinib (SU; n = 57), sorafenib (SOR; n = 62), or ≥ 1 intravenous (i.v.) administration bevacizumab (BEV; n = 25) as first AI were included. Per-patient-per-month (PPPM) costs ($2008) were estimated for drug, i.v. administration, office visits, procedures, and AE treatments. AI drug costs were estimated by applying Average Wholesale Price to treatment course. Office visit and procedure costs were based on private insurance reimbursement. Hospitalization costs were based on HCUP National Inpatient Sample charges for AEs and were converted to costs. ER visit cost was based on national average from Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.

RESULTS

Median treatment duration (mo) was 10.5 (SU), 8.1 (SOR), 7.9 (BEV). Average daily oral dosage was 32 mg (SU), 690 mg (SOR); average dose per i.v. administration was 871 mg (BEV). Total PPPM costs were $7,945 (SU), $6,990 (SOR), $15,189 (BEV). AI drugs accounted for the majority of PPPM costs ($5,639 [SU], $5,214 [SOR], $13,664 [BEV]), followed by procedures ($1,420 [SU], $1,004 [SOR], $749 [BEV]), and AE treatments ($729 [SU], $636 [SOR], $291 [BEV]).

CONCLUSIONS

BEV patients incurred about twice the cost of SU patients and more than twice the cost of SOR patients, mainly due to higher drug and i.v. administration costs. Patients who received SU incurred the highest cost for AE management.

摘要

目的

利用病历中的资源利用数据来估算接受血管生成抑制剂(AI)治疗的 mRCC 患者的治疗费用。

材料和方法

在两家美国三级肿瘤中心进行了回顾性图表审查。纳入标准为:2003 年 4 月至 2008 年 6 月期间接受非试验性 mRCC 治疗的患者,年龄≥18 岁,且至少有 1 个舒尼替尼(SU)(n=57)、索拉非尼(SOR)(n=62)或≥1 个静脉(iv)贝伐珠单抗(BEV)(n=25)的处方作为一线 AI。根据 2008 年的人均月费用(PPPM),估算了药物、iv 给药、就诊、手术和 AE 治疗的费用。AI 药物成本根据治疗疗程应用平均批发价格估算。就诊和手术费用基于私人保险报销。住院费用基于 HCUP 国家住院样本中 AE 的费用,并转换为成本。急诊就诊费用基于医疗支出面板调查的全国平均水平。

结果

中位治疗持续时间(月)分别为 10.5(SU)、8.1(SOR)、7.9(BEV)。每日口服平均剂量为 32mg(SU)、690mg(SOR);iv 给药的平均剂量为 871mg(BEV)。总 PPPM 费用分别为 7945 美元(SU)、6990 美元(SOR)、15189 美元(BEV)。AI 药物占 PPPM 成本的主要部分(SU 为 5639 美元、SOR 为 5214 美元、BEV 为 13664 美元),其次是手术(SU 为 1420 美元、SOR 为 1004 美元、BEV 为 749 美元)和 AE 治疗(SU 为 729 美元、SOR 为 636 美元、BEV 为 291 美元)。

结论

BEV 患者的费用大约是 SU 患者的两倍,是 SOR 患者的两倍多,主要是由于药物和 iv 给药成本较高。接受 SU 治疗的患者 AE 管理费用最高。

相似文献

1
Costs associated with angiogenesis inhibitor therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in clinical practice: results from a medical chart review study.临床实践中转移性肾细胞癌血管生成抑制剂治疗相关成本:来自病历回顾研究的结果。
Urol Oncol. 2012 Nov-Dec;30(6):848-55. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.07.009. Epub 2010 Oct 5.
2
Health economic changes as a result of implementation of targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: national results from DARENCA study 2.由于转移性肾细胞癌靶向治疗的实施而导致的健康经济变化:来自 DARENCA 研究 2 的国家结果。
Eur Urol. 2015 Sep;68(3):516-22. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.017. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
3
[Economic evaluation of targeted biologic therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma].[转移性肾细胞癌靶向生物治疗的经济学评估]
Klin Onkol. 2010;23(6):439-45.
4
Cost-effectiveness evaluation of sunitinib as first-line targeted therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Spain.西班牙转移性肾细胞癌一线靶向治疗舒尼替尼的成本效益评价。
Clin Transl Oncol. 2011 Dec;13(12):869-77. doi: 10.1007/s12094-011-0748-0.
5
Cost implications of IV versus oral anti-angiogenesis therapies in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: retrospective claims database analysis.晚期肾细胞癌患者静脉注射与口服抗血管生成疗法的成本影响:回顾性索赔数据库分析
Curr Med Res Opin. 2009 Aug;25(8):2081-90. doi: 10.1185/03007990903084800.
6
Treatment patterns: targeted therapies indicated for first-line management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in a real-world setting.治疗模式:在真实环境中,用于转移性肾细胞癌一线治疗的靶向治疗药物。
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2013 Jun;11(2):161-7. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2012.10.003. Epub 2012 Dec 23.
7
Economic evaluation of sunitinib malate in second-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma in Finland.芬兰苹果酸舒尼替尼用于转移性肾细胞癌二线治疗的经济学评价
Clin Ther. 2008 Feb;30(2):382-92. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2008.02.013.
8
Economic evaluation of new targeted therapies for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.转移性肾细胞癌一线治疗的新型靶向治疗药物的经济学评价。
BJU Int. 2011 Sep;108(5):665-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2010.09957.x. Epub 2011 Jan 25.
9
Potential health gains for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma in daily clinical practice: A real-world cost-effectiveness analysis of sequential first- and second-line treatments.转移性肾细胞癌患者在日常临床实践中的潜在健康获益:一线和二线序贯治疗的真实世界成本效益分析
PLoS One. 2017 May 22;12(5):e0177364. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177364. eCollection 2017.
10
Safety and treatment patterns of angiogenesis inhibitors in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: evidence from US community oncology clinics.转移性肾细胞癌患者的血管生成抑制剂的安全性和治疗模式:来自美国社区肿瘤学诊所的证据。
Med Oncol. 2012 Jun;29(2):786-94. doi: 10.1007/s12032-011-9922-z. Epub 2011 Apr 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Antiangiogenic Effect of Dopamine and Dopaminergic Agonists as an Adjuvant Therapeutic Option in the Treatment of Cancer, Endometriosis, and Osteoarthritis.多巴胺和多巴胺能激动剂的抗血管生成作用作为癌症、子宫内膜异位症和骨关节炎治疗的辅助治疗选择。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 Jun 15;24(12):10199. doi: 10.3390/ijms241210199.
2
Comparative Efficacy, Safety, and Costs of Sorafenib vs. Sunitinib as First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.索拉非尼与舒尼替尼作为转移性肾细胞癌一线治疗的疗效、安全性及成本比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2019 Jun 21;9:479. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00479. eCollection 2019.
3
Impact of adverse events, treatment modifications, and dose intensity on survival among patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with first-line sunitinib: a medical chart review across ten centers in five European countries.
不良事件、治疗调整和剂量强度对一线舒尼替尼治疗的晚期肾细胞癌患者生存的影响:一项对五个欧洲国家十个中心的病历回顾
Cancer Med. 2014 Dec;3(6):1517-26. doi: 10.1002/cam4.302. Epub 2014 Jul 18.