Chen C X, Kwekkeboom K L, Ward S E
School of Nursing, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA.
Eur J Pain. 2015 Mar;19(3):377-91. doi: 10.1002/ejp.556.
Primary dysmenorrhoea (PD) is highly prevalent among women of reproductive age and it can have significant short- and long-term consequences for both women and society as a whole. Validated symptom measures are fundamental for researchers to understand women's symptom experience of PD and to test symptom interventions. The objective of this paper was to critically review the content and psychometric properties of self-report tools to measure symptoms of PD. Databases including PubMed, PsychoINFO, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Health and Psychosocial Instruments were searched for self-report symptom measures that had been used among women with either PD or perimenstrual symptoms. A total of 15 measures met inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. The measures were categorized into generic pain measures, dysmenorrhoea-specific measures, and tools designed to measure perimenstrual symptoms. These measures had varying degrees of comprehensiveness of symptoms being measured, relevance to PD, multidimensionality and psychometric soundness. No single measure was found to be optimal for use, but some dysmenorrhoea-specific measures could be recommended if revised and further tested. Key issues in symptom measurement for PD are discussed. Future research needs to strengthen dysmenorrhoea-specific symptom measures by including a comprehensive list of symptoms based on the pathogenesis of PD, exploring relevant symptom dimensions beyond symptom severity (e.g., frequency, duration, symptom distress), and testing psychometric properties of the adapted tools using sound methodology and diverse samples.
原发性痛经(PD)在育龄女性中非常普遍,它会对女性个体乃至整个社会产生重大的短期和长期影响。经过验证的症状测量方法对于研究人员了解女性原发性痛经的症状体验以及测试症状干预措施至关重要。本文的目的是对用于测量原发性痛经症状的自我报告工具的内容和心理测量特性进行批判性综述。检索了包括PubMed、PsychoINFO、护理及相关健康文献累积索引以及健康与心理社会工具在内的数据库,以查找在患有原发性痛经或经前症状的女性中使用过的自我报告症状测量方法。共有15种测量方法符合纳入标准并被纳入最终分析。这些测量方法被分为通用疼痛测量方法、原发性痛经特异性测量方法以及旨在测量经前症状的工具。这些测量方法在被测量症状的综合程度、与原发性痛经的相关性、多维性和心理测量稳健性方面存在不同程度的差异。没有发现单一的测量方法是最优的,但如果经过修订和进一步测试,一些原发性痛经特异性测量方法可以被推荐。讨论了原发性痛经症状测量中的关键问题。未来的研究需要通过纳入基于原发性痛经发病机制的全面症状清单、探索症状严重程度之外的相关症状维度(如频率、持续时间、症状困扰)以及使用合理方法和多样样本测试改编工具的心理测量特性来加强原发性痛经特异性症状测量方法。