Suppr超能文献

每月按需注射雷珠单抗与视网膜静脉阻塞患者:SHORE 研究。

Monthly versus as-needed ranibizumab injections in patients with retinal vein occlusion: the SHORE study.

机构信息

The Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Retina Consultants Houston, Houston, Texas.

出版信息

Ophthalmology. 2014 Dec;121(12):2432-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.06.011. Epub 2014 Jul 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare pro re nata (PRN) and monthly injections of 0.5 mg ranibizumab in retinal vein occlusion (RVO) patients stabilized by monthly injections.

DESIGN

Randomized, open-label, vision-examiner masked, 15-month study.

PARTICIPANTS

Subjects with macular edema secondary to branch or central RVO.

METHODS

Subjects received monthly injections of 0.5 mg ranibizumab for 7 months and those meeting stability criteria between months 7 and 14 were randomized (1:1) to PRN injections versus continued monthly injections. Non-randomized (NR) subjects (never met stability criteria) received monthly injections.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary endpoint was the slope of change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) between months 7 and 15.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the slope of change in BCVA between months 7 and 15 in patients treated PRN versus those treated with monthly injections (P = 0.509). Mean (± standard deviation) change from baseline BCVA in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letter score at month 15 was 21.0 ± 14.1 in the PRN group (n = 82) versus 18.7 ± 14.1 in the monthly group (n = 80) and 14.5 ± 14.7 in NR subjects (n = 13). The percentage of subjects who achieved BCVA ≥ 20/40 at month 15 was 76.8% in the PRN group, 71.3% in the monthly group, and 46.2% in NR subjects. The mean (± standard deviation) change from baseline central subfield thickness was -247.8 ± 207.5 μm in the PRN group, -289.9 ± 177.2 μm in the monthly group, and -93.2 ± 225.2 μm in NR subjects. There were no significant differences in mean BCVA gains or central subfield thickness reductions at month 15 between the PRN and monthly injection groups (all > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

After edema resolution from 7 or more monthly ranibizumab injections in RVO subjects, visual outcomes at month 15 were excellent and not significantly different in subjects treated PRN versus those who continued monthly injections.

摘要

目的

比较视网膜静脉阻塞(RVO)患者每月注射 0.5mg 雷珠单抗稳定后,按需(PRN)注射与每月注射的疗效。

设计

随机、开放标签、视力检查者设盲、15 个月研究。

参与者

继发于分支或中央 RVO 的黄斑水肿患者。

方法

受试者前 7 个月每月接受 0.5mg 雷珠单抗注射,第 7 至 14 个月符合稳定标准者随机(1:1)分为 PRN 注射组或继续每月注射组。非随机(NR)受试者(从未符合稳定标准)每月接受注射。

主要观察指标

主要终点是第 7 至 15 个月最佳矫正视力(BCVA)变化斜率。

结果

PRN 治疗组与每月注射组患者第 7 至 15 个月 BCVA 变化斜率无显著差异(P=0.509)。第 15 个月时,早期治疗糖尿病视网膜病变研究字母评分的基线 BCVA 平均(±标准差)变化,PRN 组(n=82)为 21.0±14.1,每月组(n=80)为 18.7±14.1,NR 组(n=13)为 14.5±14.7。第 15 个月时,PRN 组、每月组和 NR 组分别有 76.8%、71.3%和 46.2%的患者达到 BCVA≥20/40。PRN 组中央视网膜厚度平均(±标准差)从基线变化为-247.8±207.5μm,每月组为-289.9±177.2μm,NR 组为-93.2±225.2μm。第 15 个月时,PRN 组与每月注射组的平均 BCVA 增益或中央视网膜厚度减少无显著差异(均>0.05)。

结论

在 RVO 患者接受 7 次或更多次每月雷珠单抗注射后水肿消退后,第 15 个月的视力结果良好,PRN 治疗与继续每月注射的患者之间无显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验