The Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Retina Consultants Houston, Houston, Texas.
Ophthalmology. 2014 Dec;121(12):2432-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.06.011. Epub 2014 Jul 21.
To compare pro re nata (PRN) and monthly injections of 0.5 mg ranibizumab in retinal vein occlusion (RVO) patients stabilized by monthly injections.
Randomized, open-label, vision-examiner masked, 15-month study.
Subjects with macular edema secondary to branch or central RVO.
Subjects received monthly injections of 0.5 mg ranibizumab for 7 months and those meeting stability criteria between months 7 and 14 were randomized (1:1) to PRN injections versus continued monthly injections. Non-randomized (NR) subjects (never met stability criteria) received monthly injections.
The primary endpoint was the slope of change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) between months 7 and 15.
There was no significant difference in the slope of change in BCVA between months 7 and 15 in patients treated PRN versus those treated with monthly injections (P = 0.509). Mean (± standard deviation) change from baseline BCVA in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letter score at month 15 was 21.0 ± 14.1 in the PRN group (n = 82) versus 18.7 ± 14.1 in the monthly group (n = 80) and 14.5 ± 14.7 in NR subjects (n = 13). The percentage of subjects who achieved BCVA ≥ 20/40 at month 15 was 76.8% in the PRN group, 71.3% in the monthly group, and 46.2% in NR subjects. The mean (± standard deviation) change from baseline central subfield thickness was -247.8 ± 207.5 μm in the PRN group, -289.9 ± 177.2 μm in the monthly group, and -93.2 ± 225.2 μm in NR subjects. There were no significant differences in mean BCVA gains or central subfield thickness reductions at month 15 between the PRN and monthly injection groups (all > 0.05).
After edema resolution from 7 or more monthly ranibizumab injections in RVO subjects, visual outcomes at month 15 were excellent and not significantly different in subjects treated PRN versus those who continued monthly injections.
比较视网膜静脉阻塞(RVO)患者每月注射 0.5mg 雷珠单抗稳定后,按需(PRN)注射与每月注射的疗效。
随机、开放标签、视力检查者设盲、15 个月研究。
继发于分支或中央 RVO 的黄斑水肿患者。
受试者前 7 个月每月接受 0.5mg 雷珠单抗注射,第 7 至 14 个月符合稳定标准者随机(1:1)分为 PRN 注射组或继续每月注射组。非随机(NR)受试者(从未符合稳定标准)每月接受注射。
主要终点是第 7 至 15 个月最佳矫正视力(BCVA)变化斜率。
PRN 治疗组与每月注射组患者第 7 至 15 个月 BCVA 变化斜率无显著差异(P=0.509)。第 15 个月时,早期治疗糖尿病视网膜病变研究字母评分的基线 BCVA 平均(±标准差)变化,PRN 组(n=82)为 21.0±14.1,每月组(n=80)为 18.7±14.1,NR 组(n=13)为 14.5±14.7。第 15 个月时,PRN 组、每月组和 NR 组分别有 76.8%、71.3%和 46.2%的患者达到 BCVA≥20/40。PRN 组中央视网膜厚度平均(±标准差)从基线变化为-247.8±207.5μm,每月组为-289.9±177.2μm,NR 组为-93.2±225.2μm。第 15 个月时,PRN 组与每月注射组的平均 BCVA 增益或中央视网膜厚度减少无显著差异(均>0.05)。
在 RVO 患者接受 7 次或更多次每月雷珠单抗注射后水肿消退后,第 15 个月的视力结果良好,PRN 治疗与继续每月注射的患者之间无显著差异。