Hagoort Peter
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2014 Oct;28:136-41. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2014.07.013. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
Current views on the neurobiological underpinnings of language are discussed that deviate in a number of ways from the classical Wernicke-Lichtheim-Geschwind model. More areas than Broca's and Wernicke's region are involved in language. Moreover, a division along the axis of language production and language comprehension does not seem to be warranted. Instead, for central aspects of language processing neural infrastructure is shared between production and comprehension. Three different accounts of the role of Broca's area in language are discussed. Arguments are presented in favor of a dynamic network view, in which the functionality of a region is co-determined by the network of regions in which it is embedded at particular moments in time. Finally, core regions of language processing need to interact with other networks (e.g. the attentional networks and the ToM network) to establish full functionality of language and communication.
本文讨论了当前关于语言神经生物学基础的观点,这些观点在许多方面与经典的韦尼克-利希海姆-盖施温德模型有所不同。参与语言的区域不止布洛卡区和韦尼克区。此外,沿语言产生和语言理解轴的划分似乎并不合理。相反,对于语言处理的核心方面,神经基础在产生和理解之间是共享的。本文讨论了布洛卡区在语言中作用的三种不同观点。提出了支持动态网络观点的论据,即一个区域的功能是由它在特定时刻所嵌入的区域网络共同决定的。最后,语言处理的核心区域需要与其他网络(如注意力网络和心理理论网络)相互作用,以建立语言和交流的完整功能。