Walcott Brian P, Khanna Arjun, Kwon Churl-Su, Phillips H Westley, Nahed Brian V, Coumans Jean-Valery
Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, White Building Room 502, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
Department of Neurosurgery, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, White Building Room 502, Boston, MA 02114, USA.
J Clin Neurosci. 2014 Dec;21(12):2107-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.05.016. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
Although the pre-surgical management of patients with acute traumatic subdural hematoma prioritizes rapid transport to the operating room, there is conflicting evidence regarding the importance of time interval from injury to surgery with regards to outcomes. We sought to determine the association of surgical timing with outcomes for subdural hematoma. A retrospective review was performed of 522 consecutive patients admitted to a single center from 2006-2012 who underwent emergent craniectomy for acute subdural hematoma. After excluding patients with unknown time of injury, penetrating trauma, concurrent cerebrovascular injury, epidural hematoma, or intraparenchymal hemorrhage greater than 30 mL, there remained 45 patients identified for analysis. Using a multiple regression model, we examined the effect of surgical timing, in addition to other variables on in-hospital mortality (primary outcome), as well as the need for tracheostomy or gastrostomy (secondary outcome). We found that increasing injury severity score (odds ratio [OR] 1.146; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.035-1.270; p=0.009) and age (OR1.066; 95%CI 1.006-1.129; p=0.031) were associated with in-hospital mortality in multivariate analysis. In this model, increasing time to surgery was not associated with mortality, and in fact had a significant effect in decreasing mortality (OR 0.984; 95%CI 0.971-0.997; p=0.018). Premorbid aspirin use was associated with a paradoxical decrease in mortality (OR 0.019; 95%CI 0.001-0.392; p=0.010). In this patient sample, shorter time interval from injury to surgery was not associated with better outcomes. While there are potential confounding factors, these findings support the evaluation of rigorous preoperative resuscitation as a priority in future study.
尽管急性创伤性硬膜下血肿患者的术前管理优先考虑快速转运至手术室,但关于受伤至手术的时间间隔对预后的重要性,证据存在冲突。我们试图确定手术时机与硬膜下血肿预后之间的关联。对2006年至2012年期间连续入住单一中心的522例因急性硬膜下血肿接受急诊颅骨切除术的患者进行了回顾性研究。在排除受伤时间不明、穿透性创伤、并发脑血管损伤、硬膜外血肿或脑实质内出血大于30 mL的患者后,剩余45例患者纳入分析。我们使用多元回归模型,除其他变量外,研究了手术时机对住院死亡率(主要结局)以及气管切开术或胃造口术需求(次要结局)的影响。我们发现,在多变量分析中,损伤严重程度评分增加(比值比[OR] 1.146;95%置信区间[CI] 1.035 - 1.270;p = 0.009)和年龄增加(OR1.066;95%CI 1.006 - 1.129;p = 0.031)与住院死亡率相关。在该模型中,手术时间延长与死亡率无关,事实上对降低死亡率有显著影响(OR 0.984;95%CI 0.971 - 0.997;p = 0.018)。病前使用阿司匹林与死亡率反常降低相关(OR 0.019;95%CI 0.001 - 0.392;p = 0.010)。在该患者样本中,受伤至手术的时间间隔较短与较好的预后无关。虽然存在潜在的混杂因素,但这些发现支持在未来研究中将严格的术前复苏评估作为优先事项。