Das Bikramjit, Mitra Subhro, Samanta Arijit, Samal Rajiv Kumar
Department of Anaesthesiology, Government Medical College, Haldwani, India.
Department of Anaesthesiology, Government Medical College, Haldwani, India.
Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2014 Sep;52(3):110-3. doi: 10.1016/j.aat.2014.05.009. Epub 2014 Jul 26.
Combined introducer tool and stylet technique of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (PLMA) insertion was compared with the conventional digital manipulation and introducer tool technique in children with a rigid neck collar.
This was a randomized, single blinded, prospective study. Ninety ASA Grade I-II children weighing 10-20 kg were randomly allocated for PLMA insertion using the digital, introducer tool (IT) or combined IT and stylet techniques. Each group contained 30 patients. Difficult laryngoscopy was simulated using a rigid neck collar. The laryngoscopic view was graded prior to PLMA insertion. The digital and IT techniques were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. The combined technique involved attaching the IT to the PLMA and inserting a flexible stylet through the drain tube.
The median Cormack and Lehane grade was 2 in all three groups. Insertion was more frequently successful with the combined technique at the first attempt (combined 100%, digital 65.38%, IT 66.67%; p < 0.05), but success after three attempts was similar (combined 100%, digital 86.67%, IT 90%; p > 0.05). The time taken for successful placement was similar among groups at the first attempt, but was shorter for the combined technique for overall attempts (combined 18.33 ± 1.27 seconds, digital 27.85 ± 9.05 seconds, IT 26.89 ± 7.17 seconds; p < 0.05). There was no difference in postoperative airway morbidity.
PLMA insertion with combined IT and stylet technique was more frequently successful than the digital or IT technique in pediatric patients without cervical spine motion.
在佩戴硬质颈托的儿童中,比较了ProSeal喉罩气道(PLMA)插入的联合导入器工具和管芯技术与传统的手指操作和导入器工具技术。
这是一项随机、单盲、前瞻性研究。90名体重10 - 20千克的美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)I - II级儿童被随机分配使用手指操作、导入器工具(IT)或联合IT和管芯技术进行PLMA插入。每组包含30名患者。使用硬质颈托模拟困难喉镜检查。在插入PLMA之前对喉镜视野进行分级。手指操作和IT技术按照制造商的说明进行。联合技术包括将IT连接到PLMA并通过引流管插入一根柔性管芯。
所有三组的Cormack和Lehane分级中位数均为2级。联合技术首次尝试插入成功率更高(联合技术100%,手指操作65.38%,IT 66.67%;p < 0.05),但三次尝试后的成功率相似(联合技术100%,手指操作86.67%,IT 90%;p > 0.05)。首次尝试时各组成功放置所需时间相似,但总体尝试时联合技术所需时间更短(联合技术18.33 ± 1.27秒,手指操作27.85 ± 9.05秒,IT 26.89 ± 7.17秒;p < 0.05)。术后气道并发症无差异。
在无颈椎活动的儿科患者中,联合IT和管芯技术插入PLMA比手指操作或IT技术更常成功。