McKinn Shannon, Bonner Carissa, Jansen Jesse, McCaffery Kirsten
Aust J Prim Health. 2015;21(3):354-9. doi: 10.1071/PY14068.
Recruiting general practitioners (GPs) for participation in primary care research is vitally important, but it can be very difficult for researchers to engage time-poor GPs. This paper describes six different strategies used by a research team recruiting Australian GPs for three qualitative interview studies and one experimental study, and reports the response rates and costs incurred. Strategies included: (1) mailed invitations via Divisions of General Practice; (2) electronic newsletters; (3) combining mailed invitations and newsletter; (4) in-person recruitment at GP conferences; (5) conference satchel inserts; and (6) combining in-person recruitment and satchel inserts. Response rates ranged from 0 (newsletter) to 30% (in-person recruitment). Recruitment costs perparticipant ranged from A$83 (in-person recruitment) to A$232 (satchel inserts). Mailed invitations can be viable for qualitative studies, especially when free/low-cost mailing lists are used, if the response rate is less important. In-person recruitment at GP conferences can be effective for short quantitative studies, where a higher response rate is important. Newsletters and conference satchel inserts were expensive and ineffective.
招募全科医生(GP)参与初级保健研究至关重要,但研究人员要让时间紧张的全科医生参与进来可能非常困难。本文描述了一个研究团队为三项定性访谈研究和一项实验研究招募澳大利亚全科医生时采用的六种不同策略,并报告了回复率和所产生的成本。策略包括:(1)通过全科医学部门邮寄邀请函;(2)电子通讯;(3)将邮寄邀请函和通讯相结合;(4)在全科医生会议上进行现场招募;(5)在会议资料袋中插入宣传材料;(6)将现场招募和资料袋插入宣传材料相结合。回复率从0(通讯)到30%(现场招募)不等。每位参与者的招募成本从83澳元(现场招募)到232澳元(资料袋插入宣传材料)不等。如果回复率不太重要,邮寄邀请函对于定性研究是可行的,尤其是在使用免费/低成本邮件列表时。在全科医生会议上进行现场招募对于短期定量研究可能有效,因为较高的回复率很重要。通讯和会议资料袋插入宣传材料成本高昂且效果不佳。