Wu Song, Sun Jiaqing, Cai Wei, Jin Shenghua
1 School of Psychology Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Psychol Rep. 2014 Jun;114(3):866-79. doi: 10.2466/07.09.PR0.114k27w5. Epub 2014 Apr 25.
Two studies were conducted to replicate and extend previous findings on the effect of uncooperative behavior on group cooperation (the "bad apple" effect). Study 1 (56 women, 40 men; M age = 23.5 yr.) manipulated information about contributions from the bad apple, controlling for overall contributions to a group account. Study 2 (50 women, 34 men; M age = 20.4 yr.) compared the effects of a bad apple and a good apple on cooperation. The social value orientation of participants was measured to explore individual differences in the bad apple effect. The results revealed a bad apple (a) decreased cooperation among individuals with proself and prosocial orientations in Study 1, and (b) had a greater effect than a good apple on those who were proself compared to prosocial in Study 2.
进行了两项研究,以复制和扩展先前关于不合作行为对群体合作影响(“坏苹果”效应)的研究结果。研究1(56名女性,40名男性;平均年龄 = 23.5岁)操纵了关于“坏苹果”贡献的信息,同时控制对群体账户的总体贡献。研究2(50名女性,34名男性;平均年龄 = 20.4岁)比较了“坏苹果”和“好苹果”对合作的影响。测量了参与者的社会价值取向,以探究“坏苹果”效应中的个体差异。结果显示,“坏苹果”(a)在研究1中降低了亲己和亲社会取向个体之间的合作,并且(b)在研究2中,相比于亲社会个体,对亲己个体的影响比对亲社会个体的影响更大。