Kortenkamp Katherine V, Moore Colleen F
University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI, USA.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 May;32(5):603-15. doi: 10.1177/0146167205284006.
Many environmental problems are resource dilemmas that contain two components-social and temporal-that encourage individuals not to act in the best interest of the group. Most research has focused on the social component. The authors examined the importance of the temporal component in two resource dilemma tasks. Participants (N = 112) reported their willingness to limit resource consumption in response to hypothetical dilemmas and forfeited extra credit points in response to a real dilemma. Cooperation rates were higher when the temporal dilemma was diminished, when uncertainty about environmental impacts was low, and for women. Individuals high in both proenvironmentalism and consideration of future consequences sustained high levels of cooperation even in the face of strong temporal dilemmas.
许多环境问题都是资源困境,包含社会和时间两个因素,这会促使个人不按照群体的最佳利益行事。大多数研究都集中在社会因素上。作者在两项资源困境任务中考察了时间因素的重要性。参与者(N = 112)报告了他们在应对假设困境时限制资源消耗的意愿,以及在应对实际困境时放弃额外学分的情况。当时间困境减少、环境影响的不确定性较低时,合作率较高,女性的合作率也较高。即使面对强烈的时间困境,环保主义和对未来后果考虑程度都高的个体仍能保持较高的合作水平。