Wanner Chistoph, März Winfried, Varushchanka Andrei, Apanasovich Natallia, Dosta Nickolay, Yakubtsevich Ruslan, Locatelli Francesco
Division of Nephrology, University Hospital of Würzburg, Würzburg, Medical Clinic V (Nephrology, Hypertensiology, Endocrinology, Diabetology, Rheumatology) Mannheim Medical Faculty, University of Heidelberg, Synlab Academy, Mannheim, Germany, Clinical Institute of Medical and Chemical Laboratory Diagnostics, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria, Gomel Regional Specialized Clinical Hospital, Gomel, Brest Regional Hospital, Brest, Belarus, and Hospital A. Manzoni, Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Lecco, Italy.
Clin Nephrol. 2014 Sep;82(3):163-72. doi: 10.5414/cn108237.
We evaluated the effects of colestilan, a non-absorbed anion-exchange resin, on lipids and lipoproteins in dialysis patients.
This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, flexible-dose study incorporating a placebo-controlled withdrawal period tested for superiority vs. placebo and non-inferiority vs. simvastatin. Dialysis patients with serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL-C) ≥ 100 mg/dL received colestilan 3 - 12 g/day or simvastatin 10 - 40 mg/day for 16 weeks, and were then re-randomized to continue active medication or receive placebo for 4 weeks. Co-primary endpoints were the percent change in serum LDL-C level during the active and placebo comparison phases.
Colestilan was non-inferior to simvastatin for lowering serum LDL-C (mean changes -29.5% vs. -28.9%; difference 0.6%, 95% CI -5.7, 4.5). Colestilan was more effective than placebo at maintaining control of serum LDL-C levels during the withdrawal phase (mean change +4.4% vs. +41.7%; difference -37.4%; p < 0.001). Reductions in total cholesterol were similar with both drugs, but simvastatin was more effective at controlling triglyceride levels. Adverse events most commonly affected the gastrointestinal system.
In dialysis patients, colestilan was more effective than placebo at maintaining control of serum LDL-C levels, was noninferior to simvastatin in terms of the reduction in LDL-C achieved, and was generally well tolerated.
我们评估了不被吸收的阴离子交换树脂考来替兰对透析患者血脂和脂蛋白的影响。
这项随机、双盲、双模拟、灵活剂量研究纳入了一个安慰剂对照撤药期,测试其相对于安慰剂的优效性以及相对于辛伐他汀的非劣效性。血清低密度脂蛋白(LDL-C)≥100mg/dL的透析患者接受3 - 12g/天的考来替兰或10 - 40mg/天的辛伐他汀治疗16周,然后重新随机分组继续接受活性药物治疗或接受安慰剂治疗4周。共同主要终点是活性药物和安慰剂比较阶段血清LDL-C水平的变化百分比。
考来替兰在降低血清LDL-C方面不劣于辛伐他汀(平均变化-29.5%对-28.9%;差异0.6%,95%CI -5.7,4.5)。在撤药阶段,考来替兰在维持血清LDL-C水平控制方面比安慰剂更有效(平均变化+4.4%对+41.7%;差异-37.4%;p<0.001)。两种药物降低总胆固醇的效果相似,但辛伐他汀在控制甘油三酯水平方面更有效。不良事件最常影响胃肠道系统。
在透析患者中,考来替兰在维持血清LDL-C水平控制方面比安慰剂更有效,在降低LDL-C方面不劣于辛伐他汀,且总体耐受性良好。