Lowman W, Marais M, Ahmed K, Marcus L
Microbiology and Molecular Pathology Departments, Vermaak and Partners Pathologists, Gauteng, South Africa; Wits Donald Gordon Medical Centre, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Microbiology and Molecular Pathology Departments, Vermaak and Partners Pathologists, Gauteng, South Africa.
J Hosp Infect. 2014 Oct;88(2):66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2014.06.009. Epub 2014 Jul 10.
Screening for carriage of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) is considered an important infection prevention and control strategy. To date, screening has relied primarily on culture although polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based screening is gaining momentum. Currently there is no gold standard screening method and consequently it is important to consider the implications of different diagnostic strategies used in active surveillance.
To assess the utility of a multiplex PCR screening strategy, as a component of active surveillance, for detection of CPE in patients admitted to various hospitals.
A single rectal swab was collected from patients at various hospitals, considered to be at risk of colonization with CPE. Comparison of a modified US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention culture protocol with a PCR-based assay for the detection of the blaNDM, blaKPC, blaOxA-48-like, blaVIM, blaIMP, and blaGES genes was performed.
Of the 251 consecutive rectal swabs collected, 30 were PCR positive for one or more carbapenemase genes. Fifteen (50%) were culture positive and CPE only accounted for six isolates. PCR demonstrated excellent sensitivity (100%), specificity (89.8%), and negative predictive value (100%) for detection of CPE, but a positive predictive value of only 46.6% and 16.6% for detection of carbapenemase-producing Gram-negatives and CPE, respectively.
The apparent excellent performance characteristics of PCR for detection of CPE from rectal swabs must be tempered by knowledge of CPE prevalence and be interpreted within a defined epidemiological context. Further comparative research with culture, evaluating the clinical utility of PCR-based assays as a screening tool, is needed.
筛查产碳青霉烯酶肠杆菌科细菌(CPE)的携带情况被视为一项重要的感染预防与控制策略。迄今为止,筛查主要依赖培养法,尽管基于聚合酶链反应(PCR)的筛查正逐渐兴起。目前尚无金标准筛查方法,因此,考虑主动监测中使用的不同诊断策略的影响很重要。
评估多重PCR筛查策略作为主动监测的一部分,在检测各医院入院患者CPE中的效用。
从各医院被认为有CPE定植风险的患者中采集单次直肠拭子。将改良的美国疾病控制与预防中心培养方案与基于PCR的检测blaNDM、blaKPC、blaOxA - 48样、blaVIM、blaIMP和blaGES基因的检测方法进行比较。
在连续采集的251份直肠拭子中,30份一种或多种碳青霉烯酶基因的PCR检测呈阳性。15份(50%)培养阳性,CPE仅占6株分离株。PCR检测CPE的敏感性极佳(100%)、特异性(89.8%)和阴性预测值(100%),但检测产碳青霉烯酶革兰阴性菌和CPE的阳性预测值分别仅为46.6%和16.6%。
PCR检测直肠拭子中CPE的明显优异性能特征必须结合CPE流行情况来考量,并在特定的流行病学背景下进行解读。需要进一步开展与培养法的比较研究,评估基于PCR的检测方法作为筛查工具的临床效用。