Shiley Eye Center, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States.
Ophthalmic Genetics and Visual Function Branch, National Eye Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Jul 31;55(9):5510-21. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-14359.
To analyze the genetic test results of probands referred to eyeGENE with a diagnosis of hereditary maculopathy.
Patients with Best macular dystrophy (BMD), Doyne honeycomb retinal dystrophy (DHRD), Sorsby fundus dystrophy (SFD), or late-onset retinal degeneration (LORD) were screened for mutations in BEST1, EFEMP1, TIMP3, and CTRP5, respectively. Patients with pattern dystrophy (PD) were screened for mutations in PRPH2, BEST1, ELOVL4, CTRP5, and ABCA4; patients with cone-rod dystrophy (CRD) were screened for mutations in CRX, ABCA4, PRPH2, ELOVL4, and the c.2513G>A p.Arg838His variant in GUCY2D. Mutation analysis was performed by dideoxy sequencing. Impact of novel variants was evaluated using the computational tool PolyPhen.
Among the 213 unrelated patients, 38 had BMD, 26 DHRD, 74 PD, 8 SFD, 6 LORD, and 54 CRD; six had both PD and BMD, and one had no specific clinical diagnosis. BEST1 variants were identified in 25 BMD patients, five with novel variants of unknown significance (VUS). Among the five patients with VUS, one was diagnosed with both BMD and PD. A novel EFEMP1 variant was identified in one DHRD patient. TIMP3 novel variants were found in two SFD patients, PRPH2 variants in 14 PD patients, ABCA4 variants in four PD patients, and p.Arg838His GUCY2D mutation in six patients diagnosed with dominant CRD; one patient additionally had a CRX VUS. ABCA4 mutations were identified in 15 patients with recessive CRD.
Of the 213 samples, 55 patients (26%) had known causative mutations, and 13 (6%) patients had a VUS that was possibly pathogenic. Overall, selective screening for mutations in BEST1, PRPH2, and ABCA4 would likely yield the highest success rate in identifying the genetic basis for macular dystrophy phenotypes. Because of the overlap in phenotypes between BMD and PD, it would be beneficial to screen genes associated with both diseases.
分析因遗传性黄斑病变就诊于 eyeGENE 的先证者的基因检测结果。
对 Best 黄斑营养不良(BMD)、Doyne 蜂窝状视网膜营养不良(DHRD)、Sorsby 眼底营养不良(SFD)或晚发性视网膜变性(LORD)患者进行 BEST1、EFEMP1、TIMP3 和 CTRP5 基因突变筛查;对图案性黄斑营养不良(PD)患者进行 PRPH2、BEST1、ELOVL4、CTRP5 和 ABCA4 基因突变筛查;对锥-杆细胞营养不良(CRD)患者进行 CRX、ABCA4、PRPH2、ELOVL4 和 GUCY2D 基因 c.2513G>A p.Arg838His 变异体的基因突变筛查。通过双脱氧测序进行突变分析。使用计算工具 PolyPhen 评估新变异体的影响。
在 213 名无血缘关系的患者中,38 名患有 BMD、26 名患有 DHRD、74 名患有 PD、8 名患有 SFD、6 名患有 LORD、54 名患有 CRD;6 名患者同时患有 PD 和 BMD,1 名患者无明确的临床诊断。在 25 名 BMD 患者中发现了 BEST1 变异体,其中 5 名患者的变异体意义不明(VUS)。在 5 名 VUS 患者中,1 名患者同时被诊断为 BMD 和 PD。在 1 名 DHRD 患者中发现了一种新型 EFEMP1 变异体。在 2 名 SFD 患者中发现了 TIMP3 新型变异体,在 14 名 PD 患者中发现了 PRPH2 变异体,在 4 名 PD 患者中发现了 ABCA4 变异体,在 6 名被诊断为显性 CRD 的患者中发现了 p.Arg838His GUCY2D 突变;1 名患者还存在 CRX VUS。在 15 名患有隐性 CRD 的患者中发现了 ABCA4 突变。
在 213 个样本中,55 名(26%)患者存在已知的致病突变,13 名(6%)患者存在可能致病的 VUS。总体而言,选择性筛查 BEST1、PRPH2 和 ABCA4 基因突变可能会最大程度地确定黄斑营养不良表型的遗传基础。由于 BMD 和 PD 的表型存在重叠,因此筛查与两种疾病相关的基因将是有益的。