Guidry Virginia T, Lowman Amy, Hall Devon, Baron Dothula, Wing Steve
Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Rural Empowerment Association for Community Help (REACH), Warsaw, NC.
New Solut. 2014;24(2):153-70. doi: 10.2190/NS.24.2.c.
Environmental justice (EJ) research requires attention to consequences for research participants beyond those typically considered by institutional review boards. The imbalance of power between impacted communities and those who create and regulate pollution creates challenges for participation, yet research can also benefit those involved. Our community-academic partnership designed the Rural Air Pollutants and Children's Health (RAPCH) study to provide positive impacts while measuring health effects at three low-resource public middle schools near concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs) in North Carolina. We evaluated perceived benefits and challenges of study involvement by interviewing school staff and community liaisons who facilitated data collection. Reported benefits included enhancement of students' academic environment and increased community environmental awareness; challenges were associated mainly with some participants' immaturity. Leadership from a strong community-based organization was crucial to recruitment, yet our approach entailed minimal focus on EJ, which may have limited opportunities for community education or organizing for environmental health.
环境正义(EJ)研究需要关注研究参与者所面临的后果,这些后果超出了机构审查委员会通常考虑的范围。受影响社区与造成和监管污染的群体之间的权力不平衡给参与研究带来了挑战,但研究也能使相关人员受益。我们的社区-学术伙伴关系设计了农村空气污染物与儿童健康(RAPCH)研究,旨在产生积极影响,同时在北卡罗来纳州集中式动物饲养场(CAFO)附近的三所资源匮乏的公立中学测量健康影响。我们通过采访协助数据收集的学校工作人员和社区联络人,评估了参与研究的感知益处和挑战。报告的益处包括改善学生的学术环境和提高社区环境意识;挑战主要与一些参与者的不成熟有关。一个强大的社区组织的领导对招募工作至关重要,但我们的方法对环境正义关注甚少,这可能限制了社区教育或促进环境卫生组织工作的机会。