Badejo Joseph A, Abiodun Oyindamola O, Akinola Olugbenga, Happi Christian T, Sowunmi Akintunde, Gbotosho Grace O
Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Malar J. 2014 Aug 5;13:299. doi: 10.1186/1475-2875-13-299.
Artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) remains the most effective chemotherapeutic strategy in the management of malaria. However, reports of reduced susceptibility of Plasmodium falciparum to the ACT justify the need for continued search for alternative anti-malarial drugs. The use of antibiotics with anti-malarial properties represents a potentially valuable chemotherapeutic option for the management of drug resistant infections. Thus, the intrinsic anti-malarial activity of the combination of clinical doses of rifampicin with amodiaquine and artemether was evaluated in an animal model using Plasmodium berghei.
A modification of the suppressive tests in vivo was employed. The anti-malarial activity of standard doses of amodiaquine (AQ) with or without artemether (ART) and combined with varying doses of rifampicin (RIF 15 mg/kg or RIF 30 mg/kg body weight) was evaluated in 40 mice sub-divided into eight groups and inoculated intraperitoneally with 1 × 10(7) red blood cells infected with chloroquine-resistant P. berghei ANKA strain. There were two control groups of animals, one group received amodiaquine alone while the other group received saline. Parasiticidal activity and survival of the animals were assessed over 21 days.
Parasitaemia in the control animals peaked at 38% on day 9 and all animals died by day 10. The combination of amodiaquine with rifampicin 15 mg/kg body weight was the most effective of all the combinations and more efficacious than amodiaquine alone. The order of superiority of anti-malarial efficacy of the combinations was as follows; AQ + RIF 15 > AQ > AQ + ART + RIF 30 > AQ + ART + RIF 15 > AQ +RIF 30.
The combination of the clinical dose of rifampicin (15 mg/kg) with amodiaquine represents a potentially valuable treatment option in management of drug resistant malaria. In addition, the role of pharmacokinetic interaction in multiple drug therapy cannot be over-emphasized.
以青蒿素为基础的联合疗法(ACT)仍然是疟疾治疗中最有效的化疗策略。然而,有报道称恶性疟原虫对ACT的敏感性降低,这证明有必要继续寻找替代抗疟药物。使用具有抗疟特性的抗生素是治疗耐药感染的一种潜在有价值的化疗选择。因此,在使用伯氏疟原虫的动物模型中评估了临床剂量的利福平与阿莫地喹和蒿甲醚联合使用时的内在抗疟活性。
采用体内抑制试验的改良方法。将40只小鼠分为8组,腹腔注射感染耐氯喹伯氏疟原虫ANKA株的1×10⁷个红细胞,评估标准剂量的阿莫地喹(AQ)单独或与蒿甲醚(ART)联合,并与不同剂量的利福平(15mg/kg或30mg/kg体重)联合使用时的抗疟活性。有两个动物对照组,一组单独接受阿莫地喹,另一组接受生理盐水。在21天内评估动物的杀虫活性和存活率。
对照动物的疟原虫血症在第9天达到峰值38%,所有动物在第10天死亡。阿莫地喹与15mg/kg体重的利福平联合使用是所有组合中最有效的,比单独使用阿莫地喹更有效。联合抗疟疗效的优势顺序如下:AQ+RIF 15>AQ>AQ+ART+RIF 30>AQ+ART+RIF 15>AQ+RIF 30。
临床剂量的利福平(15mg/kg)与阿莫地喹联合使用是治疗耐药疟疾的一种潜在有价值的治疗选择。此外,药代动力学相互作用在多药治疗中的作用再怎么强调也不为过。