Suppr超能文献

重症患者研究性支气管镜检查的安全性。

Safety of research bronchoscopy in critically ill patients.

作者信息

Prebil Sarah E W, Andrews Joel, Cribbs Sushma K, Martin Greg S, Esper Annette

机构信息

University of Minnesota, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Minneapolis, MN.

Emory University, Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Atlanta, GA.

出版信息

J Crit Care. 2014 Dec;29(6):961-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.06.006. Epub 2014 Jun 13.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) are common procedures in intensive care units; however, no contemporaneous safety and outcomes data have been reported, particularly for critically ill patients.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from teaching hospital adult intensive care units.

INTERVENTIONS

One hundred mechanically ventilated patients with severe sepsis, septic shock, acute lung injury (ALI), and/or acute respiratory distress syndrome underwent bronchoscopy with unilateral BAL. Data collected included demographics, presence of sepsis or ALI, Pao2 to Fio2 ratio, positive end-expiratory pressure, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation score, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, and peri- or postprocedural complications.

RESULTS

Men comprised 51% of the patients; 81% of the patients were black, and 15% were white. The mean age was 52 (SD, ±16) years. The mean Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation score was 22 (±7.5), whereas the median Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was 9 (interquartile range, 5-12). Ten patients (10%) had complications during or immediately after the procedure. Hypoxemia during or immediately after the BAL was the most common complication. Ninety percent of the complications were related to transient hypoxemia, whereas bradycardia and hypotension each occurred in 1 patient. Age, female sex, and higher positive end-expiratory pressure were associated with complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Bronchoscopy with BAL in critically ill patients with sepsis and ALI is well tolerated with low risk of complications, primarily related to manageable hypoxemia.

摘要

目的

支气管镜检查和支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)是重症监护病房常见的操作;然而,尚未有同期的安全性和结局数据报道,尤其是针对重症患者。

设计

这是一项对教学医院成人重症监护病房前瞻性收集的数据进行的回顾性分析。

干预措施

100例机械通气的严重脓毒症、感染性休克、急性肺损伤(ALI)和/或急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者接受了单侧BAL支气管镜检查。收集的数据包括人口统计学资料、脓毒症或ALI的存在情况、氧合指数(Pao2/Fio2)、呼气末正压、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE)评分、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分以及操作期间或操作后的并发症。

结果

男性患者占51%;81%的患者为黑人,15%为白人。平均年龄为52(标准差,±16)岁。平均APACHE评分为22(±7.5),而SOFA评分中位数为9(四分位间距,5 - 12)。10例患者(10%)在操作期间或操作后立即出现并发症。BAL期间或之后立即出现的低氧血症是最常见的并发症。90%的并发症与短暂性低氧血症有关,而心动过缓和低血压各发生在1例患者中。年龄、女性性别和较高的呼气末正压与并发症相关。

结论

脓毒症和ALI重症患者接受BAL支气管镜检查耐受性良好,并发症风险低,主要与可控制的低氧血症有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验