Lee Yun Nah, Moon Jong Ho, Kim Hee Kyung, Choi Hyun Jong, Choi Moon Han, Kim Dong Choon, Lee Tae Hoon, Cha Sang-Woo, Cho Young Deok, Park Sang-Heum
Digestive Disease Center and Research Institute, Department of Internal Medicine, SoonChunHyang University School of Medicine, Bucheon and Seoul, Korea.
Department of Pathology, SoonChunHyang University School of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea.
Endoscopy. 2014 Dec;46(12):1056-62. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1377558. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
An endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) device using a core biopsy needle was developed to improve diagnostic accuracy by simultaneously obtaining cytological aspirates and histological core samples. We prospectively compared the diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNB with standard EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) in patients with solid pancreatic masses.
Between January 2012 and May 2013, consecutive patients with solid pancreatic masses were prospectively enrolled and randomized to undergo EUS-FNB using a core biopsy needle or EUS-FNA using a standard aspiration needle at a single tertiary center. The specimen was analyzed by onsite cytology, Papanicolaou-stain cytology, and histology. The main outcome measure was diagnostic accuracy for malignancy. The secondary outcome measures were: the median number of passes required to establish a diagnosis, the proportion of patients in whom the diagnosis was established with each pass, and complication rates.
The overall accuracy of combining onsite cytology with Papanicolaou-stain cytology and histology was not significantly different for the FNB (n = 58) and FNA (n = 58) groups (98.3 % [95 %CI 94.9 % - 100 %] vs. 94.8 % [95 %CI 91.9 % - 100 %]; P = 0.671). Compared with FNA, FNB required a significantly lower median number of needle passes to establish a diagnosis (1.0 vs. 2.0; P < 0.001). On subgroup analysis of 111 patients with malignant lesions, the proportion of patients in whom malignancy was diagnosed on the first pass was significantly greater in the FNB group (72.7 % vs. 37.5 %; P < 0.001).
The overall accuracy of FNB and FNA in patients with solid pancreatic masses was comparable; however, fewer passes were required to establish the diagnosis of malignancy using FNB.This study was registered on the UMIN Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN000014057).
开发了一种使用粗针活检针的内镜超声(EUS)引导下细针活检(EUS-FNB)设备,通过同时获取细胞学吸出物和组织学粗针样本提高诊断准确性。我们前瞻性地比较了EUS-FNB与标准EUS引导下细针穿刺抽吸术(EUS-FNA)对实性胰腺肿块患者的诊断准确性。
2012年1月至2013年5月,连续纳入实性胰腺肿块患者,并在单一三级中心前瞻性地随机分为两组,分别接受使用粗针活检针的EUS-FNB或使用标准穿刺针的EUS-FNA。标本通过现场细胞学、巴氏染色细胞学和组织学进行分析。主要观察指标为恶性肿瘤的诊断准确性。次要观察指标为:确诊所需的穿刺次数中位数、每次穿刺确诊的患者比例以及并发症发生率。
FNB组(n = 58)和FNA组(n = 58)将现场细胞学与巴氏染色细胞学及组织学相结合的总体准确性无显著差异(98.3% [95%CI 94.9% - 100%] 对 94.8% [95%CI 91.9% - 100%];P = 0.671)。与FNA相比,FNB确诊所需的穿刺次数中位数显著更低(1.0对2.0;P < 0.001)。在对111例恶性病变患者的亚组分析中,FNB组首次穿刺确诊恶性肿瘤的患者比例显著更高(72.7%对37.5%;P < 0.001)。
FNB和FNA对实性胰腺肿块患者的总体准确性相当;然而,使用FNB确诊恶性肿瘤所需的穿刺次数更少。本研究已在UMIN临床试验注册中心注册(UMIN000014057)。