Suppr超能文献

22号标准细针与粗针活检针用于内镜超声引导下疑似胰腺癌取样的比较:一项随机交叉试验

Comparison of 22-gauge standard fine needle versus core biopsy needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of suspected pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.

作者信息

Noh Dong Hyo, Choi Kyu, Gu Seonhye, Cho Juhee, Jang Kee-Taek, Woo Young Sik, Lee Kyu Taek, Lee Jong Kyun, Lee Kwang Hyuck

机构信息

a Department of Medicine , Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine , Seoul , Korea.

b Department of Internal Medicine , Eulji University Hospital, Eulji University College of Medicine , Daejeon , Korea.

出版信息

Scand J Gastroenterol. 2018 Jan;53(1):94-99. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2017.1390597. Epub 2017 Oct 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is effective for tissue diagnosis of pancreatic mass. To improve diagnostic yield and drawbacks, 22-gauge (G) core biopsy (FNB) needle has been developed. This study aims to compare 22G FNA and FNB needles for EUS-guided sampling of suspected pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

This is a randomized controlled crossover trial. A total of 60 patients with suspected unresectable pancreatic cancer referred for EUS-guided sampling were randomly assigned to two groups. Both groups had 22G FNA and FNB needles performed in a randomized order. The primary endpoint was the cytological, histological and overall diagnostic accuracy of pancreatic cancer.

RESULTS

FNA and FNB needles reported similar level of diagnostic accuracy (FNA needle 95% vs. FNB needle 93.3%; p = .564), and it was not statistically different. However, cytological cellularity was significantly higher in the FNB needles compared to FNA needles (odds ratio 2.75, 95% confidence interval (CI)). There were no procedure-related complications in both needles.

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic accuracy of EUS-guided sampling for pancreatic cancer using 22G FNA is comparable to FNB needles. The cytological quality of specimen is better in the FNB needle.

摘要

背景

内镜超声引导下细针穿刺抽吸术(EUS-FNA)对胰腺肿块的组织诊断有效。为提高诊断率并克服其缺点,已研发出22号(G)粗针活检(FNB)针。本研究旨在比较22G FNA针和FNB针在EUS引导下对疑似胰腺癌进行采样的效果。

方法

这是一项随机对照交叉试验。共有60例因EUS引导采样而转诊的疑似不可切除胰腺癌患者被随机分为两组。两组均以随机顺序使用22G FNA针和FNB针进行操作。主要终点是胰腺癌的细胞学、组织学及总体诊断准确性。

结果

FNA针和FNB针的诊断准确性水平相似(FNA针为95%,FNB针为93.3%;p = 0.564),无统计学差异。然而,与FNA针相比,FNB针的细胞学细胞含量显著更高(优势比2.75,95%置信区间(CI))。两种针均未出现与操作相关的并发症。

结论

使用22G FNA针进行EUS引导下胰腺癌采样的诊断准确性与FNB针相当。FNB针采集的标本细胞学质量更好。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验