Suppr超能文献

粪便潜血试验预筛查可提高老年人结直肠癌筛查的检出率且具有成本效益。

Prescreening with FOBT Improves Yield and Is Cost-Effective in Colorectal Screening in the Elderly.

作者信息

Singhal Shashideep, Changela Kinesh, Basi Puneet, Mathur Siddharth, Reddy Sridhar, Momeni Mojdeh, Krishnaiah Mahesh, Anand Sury

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Brooklyn Hospital Center, Brooklyn, NY 11205, USA ; Digestive and Liver Diseases, Columbia University Medical Center, 5141 Broadway, New York, NY 10034, USA.

Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Brooklyn Hospital Center, Brooklyn, NY 11205, USA.

出版信息

ISRN Gastroenterol. 2014 Apr 6;2014:179291. doi: 10.1155/2014/179291. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

Background. Utilization of colonoscopy for routine colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in the elderly (patients over 75) is controversial. This study was designed to evaluate if using fecal occult blood test (FOBT) to select patients for colonoscopy can improve yield and be a cost- effective approach for the elderly. Methods. Records of 10,908 subjects who had colonoscopy during the study period were reviewed. 1496 (13.7%) were ≥75 years. In 118 of these subjects, a colonoscopy was performed to evaluate a positive FOBT. Outcomes were compared between +FOBT group (F-Group) and the asymptomatic screening group (AS-Group). The cost-effectiveness was also calculated using a median estimated standardized worldwide colonoscopy and FOBT cost (rounded to closest whole numbers) of 1000 US $ and 10 US $, respectively. Results. 118/1496 (7.9%) colonoscopies were performed for evaluation of +FOBT. 464/1496 (31%) colonoscopies were performed in AS-Group. In F-Group, high risk adenoma detection rate (HR-ADR) was 15.2%, and 11.9% had 1-2 tubular adenomas. In comparison, the control AS-Group had HR-ADR of 19.2% and 17.7% had 1-2 tubular adenomas. In the FOBT+ group, CRC was detected in 5.1% which was significantly higher than the AS-Group in which CRC was detected in 1.7% (P = 0.03). On cost-effectiveness analysis, cost per CRC detected was significantly lower, that is, 19,666 US $ in F-Group in comparison to AS-Group 58,000 US $ (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in other parameters among groups. Conclusion. Prescreening with FOBT to select elderly for colonoscopy seems to improve the yield and can be a cost-effective CRC screening approach in this subset. The benefit in the risk benefit analysis of screening the elderly appears improved by prescreening with an inexpensive tool.

摘要

背景。在老年人(75岁以上患者)中使用结肠镜检查进行常规结直肠癌(CRC)筛查存在争议。本研究旨在评估使用粪便潜血试验(FOBT)选择患者进行结肠镜检查是否能提高检出率,以及对老年人来说是否是一种具有成本效益的方法。方法。回顾了研究期间接受结肠镜检查的10908名受试者的记录。其中1496名(13.7%)年龄≥75岁。在这些受试者中,有118名因FOBT阳性而接受了结肠镜检查。对FOBT阳性组(F组)和无症状筛查组(AS组)的结果进行了比较。还使用估计的全球结肠镜检查和FOBT成本中位数(四舍五入到最接近的整数)分别为1000美元和10美元来计算成本效益。结果。118/1496(7.9%)的结肠镜检查是为了评估FOBT阳性而进行的。464/1496(31%)的结肠镜检查在AS组中进行。在F组中,高危腺瘤检出率(HR-ADR)为15.2%,11.9%有1-2个管状腺瘤。相比之下,对照AS组的HR-ADR为19.2%,17.7%有1-2个管状腺瘤。在FOBT阳性组中,CRC检出率为5.1%,显著高于AS组的1.7%(P = 0.03)。在成本效益分析中,F组每例CRC检出的成本显著更低,即19666美元,而AS组为58000美元(P < 0.05)。各组间其他参数无显著差异。结论。用FOBT进行预筛查以选择老年人进行结肠镜检查似乎能提高检出率,并且对这一亚组人群来说可能是一种具有成本效益的CRC筛查方法。通过使用廉价工具进行预筛查,对老年人进行筛查的风险效益分析中的益处似乎有所提高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/40f3/4004063/272640cda0fa/ISRN.GASTROENTEROLOGY2014-179291.001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验