Huang Yuheng, Wright Stephen I, Agrawal Aneil F
Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
PLoS Genet. 2014 Aug 7;10(8):e1004527. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004527. eCollection 2014 Aug.
Environmental heterogeneity has been hypothesized to influence levels of genetic variation but the effect of heterogeneity depends on (i) the form of heterogeneity, (ii) whether ecologically relevant or neutral loci are being considered, and (iii) the genetic basis of ecological adaptation. We surveyed genome-wide SNP diversity in replicate experimental Drosophila melanogaster populations with equal census sizes that evolved for 42 generations under one of four selection regimes: (i) salt-enriched environment (Salt), (ii) cadmium-enriched environment (Cad), (iii) temporally (Temp) or (iv) spatially (Spatial) variable environments. There was significant differentiation between all pairs of treatments but the greatest differentiation occurred between the two homogenous treatments (Cad and Salt). For sites likely under differential ecological selection (and those closely linked to them), the pattern of within-population diversity π followed the expectation from classic antagonistic selection theory: Spatial > Temp >S alt ≈ Cad. However, neutral diversity unlinked to selected sites followed a different pattern: Spatial>Salt ≈ Cad > Temp. As implicated by the latter result, measures of FST among replicate populations within treatments are consistent with differences in effective population sizes among selective regimes despite equal census sizes. Though there are clear changes in the rank order of treatments when contrasting selected and neutral sites with respect to π, the rank ordering of treatments with respect to FST appears reasonably consistent between site categories. These results demonstrate that alternative selective regimes affect within- and among-population diversity differently for different site types.
环境异质性被认为会影响遗传变异水平,但异质性的影响取决于:(i)异质性的形式;(ii)所考虑的是生态相关位点还是中性位点;以及(iii)生态适应的遗传基础。我们在具有相同普查规模的重复实验黑腹果蝇种群中,对全基因组单核苷酸多态性(SNP)多样性进行了调查,这些种群在以下四种选择 regime 之一的条件下进化了42代:(i)富盐环境(盐);(ii)富镉环境(镉);(iii)时间上(Temp)或(iv)空间上(Spatial)可变的环境。所有处理对之间都存在显著差异,但最大的差异出现在两种同质处理(镉和盐)之间。对于可能处于差异生态选择下的位点(以及与之紧密连锁的位点),种群内多样性π的模式符合经典拮抗选择理论的预期:空间>Temp>盐≈镉。然而,与选定位点不连锁的中性多样性遵循不同的模式:空间>盐≈镉>Temp。正如后一个结果所暗示的,尽管普查规模相等,但处理内重复种群之间的FST 测量值与不同选择 regime 下有效种群大小的差异一致。尽管在对比选定位点和中性位点的π时,处理的排名顺序有明显变化,但不同位点类别之间,处理在FST方面的排名顺序似乎相当一致。这些结果表明,不同的选择 regime 对不同位点类型的种群内和种群间多样性有不同影响。