Suppr超能文献

吻合器经肛门直肠切除术(STARR)治疗排便梗阻综合征后的疗效:一项荟萃分析。

Relief of obstructed defecation syndrome after stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR): a meta-analysis.

作者信息

Van Geluwe B, Stuto A, Da Pozzo F, Fieuws S, Meurette G, Lehur P A, D'Hoore A

出版信息

Acta Chir Belg. 2014 May-Jun;114(3):189-97. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2014.11681007.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) is a promising new treatment for obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) associated with rectal intussusception and/or rectocele. The aim of this work was to assess the efficacy of STARR to treat ODS.

METHODS

Outcome data after STARR for ODS were pooled according to the used constipation score. As different types of constipation scores were reported, and standardized effect sizes were calculated before performing a meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-six publications were identified with a median follow-up of 12 months (range: 3-42). In total 1298 patients were included. Six different scoring systems were used. In total 43 estimates of the effect STARR were analyzed. All studies showed a significant improvement in ODS yielding a combined standardized effect size of 3.8 (95% CI : 3.2-4.5). Although a very high degree of heterogeneity between effect sizes has been observed (I2 = 93.3%), suggesting an overestimation of this improvement. This is partially due to the use of various instruments, but largely originating from (unmeasured) study characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

The consistent finding of a decrease in the various ODS-scores confirms that STARR can reduce ODS but the effect is overestimated. This meta-analysis clearly highlights some methodological shortcomings in published data. Heterogeneity in ODS scoring implies the need for standard effect size calculation to compare published results, and underlines the urgent need for a more uniform and accurate data reporting.

摘要

目的

吻合器经肛门直肠切除术(STARR)是治疗与直肠套叠和/或直肠膨出相关的排便梗阻综合征(ODS)的一种有前景的新疗法。本研究的目的是评估STARR治疗ODS的疗效。

方法

根据所使用的便秘评分汇总STARR治疗ODS后的结果数据。由于报告了不同类型的便秘评分,在进行荟萃分析之前计算了标准化效应量。

结果

共纳入26篇文献,中位随访时间为12个月(范围:3 - 42个月)。总共纳入了1298例患者。使用了六种不同的评分系统。共分析了43项关于STARR疗效的评估。所有研究均显示ODS有显著改善,合并标准化效应量为3.8(95%CI:3.2 - 4.5)。尽管观察到效应量之间存在非常高的异质性(I² = 93.3%),这表明这种改善可能被高估。部分原因是使用了各种工具,但很大程度上源于(未测量的)研究特征。

结论

各种ODS评分均下降这一一致发现证实STARR可减轻ODS,但效果被高估。这项荟萃分析清楚地凸显了已发表数据中的一些方法学缺陷。ODS评分的异质性意味着需要计算标准效应量以比较已发表的结果,并强调迫切需要更统一和准确的数据报告。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验