Suppr超能文献

呼吸专科医生和全科医生对青年及老年哮喘患者临床管理的比较。

Comparison of clinical management of young and elderly asthmatics by respiratory specialists and general practitioners.

作者信息

Tada Mitsuhiro, Kuraki Takashige, Taooka Yasuyuki, Fuchita Hiroshi, Karino Fumi, Miura Kiyotaka, Hamaguchi Shunichi, Ohe Miki, Sutani Akihisa, Isobe Takeshi

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology and Respiratory Medicine, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine , Shimane , Japan.

出版信息

J Asthma. 2015 Mar;52(2):162-9. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2014.928311. Epub 2014 Nov 21.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Asthmatic death in the elderly is a serious problem worldwide. Differences in clinical skill between respiratory specialists (RS) and general practitioners (GP) are important in asthma control. The aim of this study was to compare asthma management between RS and GP.

METHODS

A cross-sectional survey was carried out in Shimane, Japan, in February 2009 using a questionnaire about patient background, treatment, asthma control test (ACT) and adherence to treatment. We secured the cooperation of 48 clinics (39 private clinics and 9 general hospitals). Asthmatics were divided into the elderly and young groups, and also into the RS and GP groups.

RESULTS

Clinical data of 779 patients were available for analysis. Elderly patients constituted 464 (RS group: 192, GP group: 272), while those of the young group were 315 (RS group: 207, GP group: 108). RS prescribed inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) to their elderly and young patients more than GP. The total ACT score was higher in young RS group than in young GP group, but no such difference was noted in the elderly. Despite more asthma-related symptoms, the ACT showed that elderly GP asthmatics used fewer rescue inhalers than elderly RS. Self-assessment was higher in elderly GP than elderly RS asthmatics. Adherence to therapy was better in elderly patients than young patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly asthmatics treated by GPs underestimated the severity of their asthma and asthmatics seen by GPs were undertreated. The results stress the need to engage patients in educational activities, to adhere to guidelines, and to improve the coordination between GP and RS.

摘要

背景

老年人哮喘死亡是一个全球性的严重问题。呼吸专科医生(RS)和全科医生(GP)在临床技能上的差异对哮喘控制至关重要。本研究旨在比较RS和GP对哮喘的管理情况。

方法

2009年2月在日本岛根县进行了一项横断面调查,使用了一份关于患者背景、治疗、哮喘控制测试(ACT)和治疗依从性的问卷。我们获得了48家诊所(39家私人诊所和9家综合医院)的合作。哮喘患者被分为老年组和青年组,也分为RS组和GP组。

结果

779例患者的临床数据可供分析。老年患者有464例(RS组:192例,GP组:272例),而青年组患者有315例(RS组:207例,GP组:108例)。RS给老年和青年患者开具吸入性糖皮质激素(ICSs)的比例高于GP。青年RS组的ACT总分高于青年GP组,但老年组未观察到这种差异。尽管老年GP组哮喘患者的哮喘相关症状更多,但ACT显示他们使用的急救吸入器比老年RS组少。老年GP组患者的自我评估高于老年RS组哮喘患者。老年患者的治疗依从性优于青年患者。

结论

由GP治疗的老年哮喘患者低估了其哮喘的严重程度,且GP诊治的哮喘患者治疗不足。结果强调需要让患者参与教育活动、遵守指南,并改善GP和RS之间的协调。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验