Suppr超能文献

通过TP53突变预测头颈部鳞状细胞癌的生存率。

Predicting survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma from TP53 mutation.

作者信息

Masica David L, Li Shuli, Douville Christopher, Manola Judith, Ferris Robert L, Burtness Barbara, Forastiere Arlene A, Koch Wayne M, Chung Christine H, Karchin Rachel

机构信息

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Institute for Computational Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA,

出版信息

Hum Genet. 2015 May;134(5):497-507. doi: 10.1007/s00439-014-1470-0. Epub 2014 Aug 10.

Abstract

For TP53-mutated head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs), the codon and specific amino acid sequence change resulting from a patient's mutation can be prognostic. Thus, developing a framework to predict patient survival for specific mutations in TP53 would be valuable. There are many bioinformatics and functional methods for predicting the phenotypic impact of genetic variation, but their overall clinical value remains unclear. Here, we assess the ability of 15 different methods to predict HNSCC patient survival from TP53 mutation, using TP53 mutation and clinical data from patients enrolled in E4393 by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG), which investigated whether TP53 mutations in surgical margins were predictive of disease recurrence. These methods include: server-based computational tools SIFT, PolyPhen-2, and Align-GVGD; our in-house POSE and VEST algorithms; the rules devised in Poeta et al. with and without considerations for splice-site mutations; location of mutation in the DNA-bound TP53 protein structure; and a functional assay measuring WAF1 transactivation in TP53-mutated yeast. We assessed method performance using overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from 420 HNSCC patients, of whom 224 had TP53 mutations. Each mutation was categorized as "disruptive" or "non-disruptive". For each method, we compared the outcome between the disruptive group vs. the non-disruptive group. The rules devised by Poeta et al. with or without our splice-site modification were observed to be superior to others. While the differences in OS (disruptive vs. non-disruptive) appear to be marginally significant (Poeta rules + splice rules, P = 0.089; Poeta rules, P = 0.053), both algorithms identified the disruptive group as having significantly worse PFS outcome (Poeta rules + splice rules, P = 0.011; Poeta rules, P = 0.027). In general, prognostic performance was low among assessed methods. Further studies are required to develop and validate methods that can predict functional and clinical significance of TP53 mutations in HNSCC patients.

摘要

对于TP53基因发生突变的头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC),患者突变所导致的密码子及特定氨基酸序列变化可能具有预后意义。因此,构建一个能够预测TP53基因特定突变患者生存率的框架将具有重要价值。有许多生物信息学和功能学方法可用于预测基因变异的表型影响,但其总体临床价值仍不明确。在此,我们利用东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)开展的E4393研究中患者的TP53基因突变及临床数据,评估15种不同方法预测HNSCC患者因TP53基因突变导致的生存率的能力,该研究调查了手术切缘的TP53基因突变是否可预测疾病复发。这些方法包括:基于服务器的计算工具SIFT、PolyPhen-2和Align-GVGD;我们内部开发的POSE和VEST算法;Poeta等人设计的规则(考虑和不考虑剪接位点突变情况);DNA结合型TP53蛋白结构中的突变位置;以及一项在TP53基因突变酵母中测量WAF1反式激活的功能检测。我们使用420例HNSCC患者的总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)评估方法性能,其中224例患者发生了TP53基因突变。每个突变被分类为“破坏性”或“非破坏性”。对于每种方法,我们比较了破坏性组与非破坏性组之间的结果。结果发现,Poeta等人设计的规则(无论是否经过我们的剪接位点修正)均优于其他方法。虽然OS方面的差异(破坏性组与非破坏性组)似乎接近显著水平(Poeta规则 + 剪接规则,P = 0.089;Poeta规则,P = 0.053),但两种算法均发现破坏性组的PFS结果显著更差(Poeta规则 + 剪接规则,P = 0.011;Poeta规则,P = 0.027)。总体而言,在所评估的方法中,预后性能较低。需要进一步开展研究以开发和验证能够预测HNSCC患者TP53基因突变的功能和临床意义所需的方法。

相似文献

1
Predicting survival in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma from TP53 mutation.
Hum Genet. 2015 May;134(5):497-507. doi: 10.1007/s00439-014-1470-0. Epub 2014 Aug 10.
2
Prognostic significance of truncating TP53 mutations in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Jun 1;17(11):3733-41. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0183. Epub 2011 Apr 5.
3
TP53 Mutations in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Their Impact on Disease Progression and Treatment Response.
J Cell Biochem. 2016 Dec;117(12):2682-2692. doi: 10.1002/jcb.25592. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
4
TP53 mutations and survival in squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
N Engl J Med. 2007 Dec 20;357(25):2552-61. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa073770.
5
TP53 disruptive mutations lead to head and neck cancer treatment failure through inhibition of radiation-induced senescence.
Clin Cancer Res. 2012 Jan 1;18(1):290-300. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2260. Epub 2011 Nov 16.
9
Disruptive TP53 mutation is associated with aggressive disease characteristics in an orthotopic murine model of oral tongue cancer.
Clin Cancer Res. 2011 Nov 1;17(21):6658-70. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0046. Epub 2011 Sep 8.

引用本文的文献

1
FAK Drives Resistance to Therapy in HPV-Negative Head and Neck Cancer in a p53-Dependent Manner.
Clin Cancer Res. 2024 Jan 5;30(1):187-197. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-23-0964.
2
Treating Head and Neck Cancer in the Age of Immunotherapy: A 2023 Update.
Drugs. 2023 Feb;83(3):217-248. doi: 10.1007/s40265-023-01835-2. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
5
Association of TP53 and CDKN2A Mutation Profile with Tumor Mutation Burden in Head and Neck Cancer.
Clin Cancer Res. 2022 May 2;28(9):1925-1937. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-4316.
7
Associations among smoking, MGMT hypermethylation, TP53-mutations, and relapse in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 23;15(4):e0231932. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231932. eCollection 2020.
8
Combined Aurora Kinase A (AURKA) and WEE1 Inhibition Demonstrates Synergistic Antitumor Effect in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck.
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Jun 1;25(11):3430-3442. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0440. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
9
Genomic insights into head and neck cancer.
Cancers Head Neck. 2016;1. doi: 10.1186/s41199-016-0003-z. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
10
Expression of SESN1, UHRF1BP1, and miR-377-3p as prognostic markers in mutated TP53 squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
Cancer Biol Ther. 2017 Oct 3;18(10):775-782. doi: 10.1080/15384047.2017.1373212. Epub 2017 Sep 8.

本文引用的文献

1
Phase I dendritic cell p53 peptide vaccine for head and neck cancer.
Clin Cancer Res. 2014 May 1;20(9):2433-44. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-2617. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
2
TP53 mutants in the tower of babel of cancer progression.
Hum Mutat. 2014 Jun;35(6):689-701. doi: 10.1002/humu.22514. Epub 2014 Mar 14.
3
Identifying Mendelian disease genes with the variant effect scoring tool.
BMC Genomics. 2013;14 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-S3-S3. Epub 2013 May 28.
4
Poor survival with wild-type TP53 ovarian cancer?
Gynecol Oncol. 2013 Sep;130(3):565-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.06.016. Epub 2013 Jun 22.
5
Cancer genome landscapes.
Science. 2013 Mar 29;339(6127):1546-58. doi: 10.1126/science.1235122.
6
CRAVAT: cancer-related analysis of variants toolkit.
Bioinformatics. 2013 Mar 1;29(5):647-8. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt017. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
7
p53 mutations in cancer.
Nat Cell Biol. 2013 Jan;15(1):2-8. doi: 10.1038/ncb2641.
10
Intra-tumour heterogeneity: a looking glass for cancer?
Nat Rev Cancer. 2012 Apr 19;12(5):323-34. doi: 10.1038/nrc3261.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验