Mountantonakis Stavros E, Elkassabany Nabil, Kondapalli Lavanya, Marchlinski Francis E, Mandel Jeff E, Hutchinson Mathew D
Lenox Hill Heart and Vascular Institute, New York, USA.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015 Jan;26(1):16-20. doi: 10.1111/jce.12512. Epub 2014 Sep 4.
The autonomic nervous system exerts important effects upon atrial fibrillation (AF) initiation. The strategy of anesthesia used during AF ablation may impact the provocation of AF triggers. We hypothesized that the use of general anesthesia (GA) would reduce the incidence of provokable AF triggers in patients undergoing AF ablation compared to patients studied while receiving only conscious sedation (CS).
We performed a prospective, case control study comparing the incidence of provokable AF triggers in a consecutive series of patients undergoing AF ablation under GA using a standard trigger induction protocol. We compared the frequency and distribution of AF triggers to a second cohort of historical controls (matched for age, gender, left atrial dimension, and AF phenotype) who underwent ablation while receiving CS. We calculated that 44 total subjects (22 patients in each group) were required to detect a 50% reduction in the incidence of AF triggers in the GA cohort. There was no difference between the 2 groups in the rate of AF trigger inducibility (77% vs. 68%, P = 0.26) or the number of triggers provoked per patient (1.2 ± 0.8 vs. 1.3 ± 0.8, P = 0.38). Patients ablated under GA required higher doses of phenylephrine during the trigger induction protocol (408.3 mg [52-600] vs. 158.3 mg [0-75]; P = 0.003), and tended to require higher doses of isoproterenol to initiate triggers (92.8 mg [20-111] vs. 63.6 mg [6-103]; P = 0.25).
AF trigger induction during GA is both safe and efficacious.
自主神经系统对房颤(AF)的起始发挥重要作用。房颤消融术中使用的麻醉策略可能会影响房颤触发因素的诱发。我们假设,与仅接受清醒镇静(CS)的患者相比,全身麻醉(GA)的使用会降低接受房颤消融术患者中可诱发房颤触发因素的发生率。
我们进行了一项前瞻性病例对照研究,比较了一系列连续接受GA下房颤消融术的患者中使用标准触发因素诱导方案时可诱发房颤触发因素的发生率。我们将房颤触发因素的频率和分布与第二组历史对照(根据年龄、性别、左心房大小和房颤表型匹配)进行比较,后者在接受CS时进行消融术。我们计算得出,需要44名受试者(每组22名患者)才能检测到GA组中房颤触发因素发生率降低50%。两组在房颤触发因素诱导率(77%对68%,P = 0.26)或每位患者诱发的触发因素数量(1.2±0.8对1.3±0.8,P = 0.38)方面没有差异。在触发因素诱导方案期间,接受GA消融的患者需要更高剂量的去氧肾上腺素(408.3毫克[52 - 600]对158.3毫克[0 - 75];P = 0.003),并且倾向于需要更高剂量的异丙肾上腺素来引发触发因素(92.8毫克[20 - 111]对63.6毫克[6 - 103];P = 0.25)。
GA期间房颤触发因素的诱导既安全又有效。