Leon Benjamin, Miller Bernard V, Zalos Gloria, Courville Amber B, Sumner Anne E, Powell-Wiley Tiffany M, Walter Mary F, Waclawiw Myron A, Cannon Richard O
Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Building 10-CRC Room 5-3330, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA.
Diabetes, Endocrinology and Obesity Branch, Clinical Center; National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD USA.
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2014;1(3):140-147. doi: 10.1007/s40615-014-0006-6. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
Weight loss interventions have produced little change in insulin sensitivity in black women, but mean data may obscure metabolic benefit to some and adverse effects for others. Accordingly, we analyzed insulin sensitivity relative to fat mass change following a weight loss program.
Fifty-four black women (BMI range 25.9 to 54.7 kg/m) completed the 6-month program that included nutrition information and worksite exercise facilities. Fat mass was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and insulin sensitivity index (S) was calculated from an insulin-modified intravenous glucose tolerance test using the minimal model.
Baseline S (range 0.74 to 7.58 l/mU•min) was inversely associated with fat mass ( = -0.516, < 0.001), independent of age. On average, subjects lost fat mass (baseline 40.8 ± 12.4 to 39.4 ± 12.6 kg [mean ± SD], < 0.01), but 17 women (32 %) actually gained fat mass. S for the group was unchanged (baseline 3.3 ± 1.7 to 3.2 ± 1.6, = 0.67). However, the tertile with greatest fat mass loss (-3.6 kg, range -10.7 to -1.7 kg) improved insulin sensitivity (S +0.3 ± 1.2), whereas the tertile with net fat mass gain (+0.9 kg, range -0.1 to +3.8 kg) had reduced insulin sensitivity (S -0.7 ± 1.3) from baseline values ( < 0.05 by ANOVA).
Black women in a weight loss program who lose fat mass may have improved insulin sensitivity, but fat mass gain with diminished sensitivity is common. Additional support for participants who fail to achieve fat mass loss early in an intervention may be required for success.
减肥干预措施对黑人女性的胰岛素敏感性几乎没有改变,但平均数据可能掩盖了对一些人的代谢益处和对另一些人的不良影响。因此,我们分析了减肥计划后胰岛素敏感性与脂肪量变化的关系。
54名黑人女性(体重指数范围为25.9至54.7kg/m)完成了为期6个月的计划,该计划包括营养信息和工作场所的运动设施。通过双能X线吸收法测量脂肪量,并使用最小模型从胰岛素改良的静脉葡萄糖耐量试验中计算胰岛素敏感性指数(S)。
基线S(范围为0.74至7.58l/mU•min)与脂肪量呈负相关(r = -0.516,P < 0.001),与年龄无关。平均而言,受试者脂肪量减少(基线40.8±12.4至39.4±12.6kg[平均值±标准差],P < 0.01),但17名女性(32%)实际上脂肪量增加。该组的S没有变化(基线3.3±1.7至3.2±1.6,P = 0.67)。然而,脂肪量减少最多的三分位数(-3.6kg,范围为-10.7至-1.7kg)胰岛素敏感性提高(S增加0.3±1.2),而脂肪量净增加的三分位数(+0.9kg,范围为-0.1至+3.8kg)胰岛素敏感性较基线值降低(S减少0.7±1.3)(方差分析,P < 0.05)。
参加减肥计划的黑人女性若脂肪量减少,胰岛素敏感性可能会提高,但脂肪量增加且敏感性降低的情况很常见。为使干预早期未能实现脂肪量减少的参与者取得成功,可能需要提供额外支持。