San Francisco Coordinating Center, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco.
San Francisco Coordinating Center, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco2California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, San Francisco.
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Oct;174(10):1550-7. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.3634.
Studies have shown that bisphosphonates may have antitumor and antimetastatic properties. Recently, observational studies have suggested a possible protective effect of bisphosphonates on breast cancer, but the effect of bisphosphonate use on risk of breast cancer has not been tested in randomized trials.
To assess the relationship of postmenopausal breast cancer incidence and bisphosphonate use using data from 2 randomized (1:1), double-blind, placebo-controlled trials.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Fracture Intervention Trial (FIT) randomly assigned 6459 women aged 55 to 81 years to alendronate or placebo for a mean follow-up of 3.8 years. The Health Outcomes and Reduced Incidence With Zoledronic Acid Once Yearly-Pivotal Fracture Trial (HORIZON-PFT) randomly assigned 7765 women aged 65 to 89 years to annual intravenous zoledronic acid or placebo for a mean follow-up of 2.8 years. Data were collected at clinical centers in the United States (FIT and HORIZON-PFT) and in Asia and the Pacific, Europe, North America, and South America (HORIZON-PFT). Women, in either study, with recurrent breast cancer or who reported a history of breast cancer were excluded from analyses. In each trial, a blinded review was conducted of each cancer adverse event report to verify incident invasive breast cancer cases. The primary analysis compared events in the active vs placebo group using a log-rank test.
Alendronate vs placebo (FIT) or zoledronic acid vs placebo (HORIZON-PFT).
Hazard ratio for incident breast cancer in the bisphosphonate treatment group compared to the placebo group.
There was no significant difference in the rate of breast cancer in FIT: 1.5% (n = 46) in the placebo group and 1.8% (n = 57) in the alendronate group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.24 [95% CI, 0.84-1.83]). In HORIZON-PFT, there was also no significant difference: 0.8% (n = 29) in the placebo group and 0.9% (n = 33) in the zoledronic acid group (HR, 1.15 [95% CI, 0.70-1.89]). There was also no significant difference when the data from FIT and HORIZON-PFT were pooled (HR, 1.20 [95% CI, 0.89-1.63]).
These 2 randomized clinical trials do not support the findings from observational research. Contrary to the results from observational studies, we found that 3 to 4 years of bisphosphonate treatment did not decrease the risk of invasive postmenopausal breast cancer.
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00049829 (HORIZON-PFT).
研究表明,双膦酸盐可能具有抗肿瘤和抗转移的特性。最近,观察性研究表明双膦酸盐对乳腺癌可能具有保护作用,但双膦酸盐使用对乳腺癌风险的影响尚未在随机试验中得到检验。
使用来自 2 项随机(1:1)、双盲、安慰剂对照试验的数据,评估绝经后乳腺癌发病与双膦酸盐使用之间的关系。
设计、地点和参与者:骨折干预试验(FIT)将 6459 名年龄在 55 至 81 岁之间的女性随机分配至阿伦膦酸盐或安慰剂组,平均随访 3.8 年。骨质疏松症治疗的疗效终点和安全性研究(HORIZON-PFT)将 7765 名年龄在 65 至 89 岁之间的女性随机分配至每年静脉内唑来膦酸或安慰剂组,平均随访 2.8 年。数据由美国(FIT 和 HORIZON-PFT)以及亚洲和太平洋地区、欧洲、北美和南美洲的临床中心收集。在每个研究中,对每个癌症不良事件报告进行了盲法审查,以验证侵袭性乳腺癌病例。主要分析采用对数秩检验比较活性治疗组与安慰剂组的事件。
阿伦膦酸盐与安慰剂(FIT)或唑来膦酸与安慰剂(HORIZON-PFT)。
双膦酸盐治疗组与安慰剂组相比,浸润性乳腺癌的发生风险比。
FIT 中乳腺癌的发生率没有显著差异:安慰剂组为 1.5%(n=46),阿伦膦酸盐组为 1.8%(n=57)(风险比[HR],1.24[95%CI,0.84-1.83])。在 HORIZON-PFT 中,也没有显著差异:安慰剂组为 0.8%(n=29),唑来膦酸组为 0.9%(n=33)(HR,1.15[95%CI,0.70-1.89])。将 FIT 和 HORIZON-PFT 的数据汇总后,差异也无统计学意义(HR,1.20[95%CI,0.89-1.63])。
这两项随机临床试验不支持观察性研究的结果。与观察性研究的结果相反,我们发现 3 至 4 年的双膦酸盐治疗并未降低绝经后浸润性乳腺癌的风险。
clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT00049829(HORIZON-PFT)。