Bendtsen Kristian Moss, Jensen Martin Borch, May Alfred, Rasmussen Lene Juel, Trusina Ala, Bohr Vilhelm A, Jensen Mogens H
CMOL, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark,
Eur Biophys J. 2014 Nov;43(10-11):509-16. doi: 10.1007/s00249-014-0981-x. Epub 2014 Aug 14.
We have investigated the mobility of two EGFP-tagged DNA repair proteins, WRN and BLM. In particular, we focused on the dynamics in two locations, the nucleoli and the nucleoplasm. We found that both WRN and BLM use a "DNA-scanning" mechanism, with rapid binding-unbinding to DNA resulting in effective diffusion. In the nucleoplasm WRN and BLM have effective diffusion coefficients of 1.62 and 1.34 μm(2)/s, respectively. Likewise, the dynamics in the nucleoli are also best described by effective diffusion, but with diffusion coefficients a factor of ten lower than in the nucleoplasm. From this large reduction in diffusion coefficient we were able to classify WRN and BLM as DNA damage scanners. In addition to WRN and BLM we also classified other DNA damage proteins and found they all fall into one of two categories. Either they are scanners, similar to WRN and BLM, with very low diffusion coefficients, suggesting a scanning mechanism, or they are almost freely diffusing, suggesting that they interact with DNA only after initiation of a DNA damage response.
我们研究了两种带有增强型绿色荧光蛋白(EGFP)标记的DNA修复蛋白WRN和BLM的移动性。具体而言,我们重点关注了它们在核仁与核质这两个位置的动态变化。我们发现,WRN和BLM均采用“DNA扫描”机制,与DNA的快速结合和解离导致了有效的扩散。在核质中,WRN和BLM的有效扩散系数分别为1.62和1.34μm²/s。同样,核仁中的动态变化也最好用有效扩散来描述,但其扩散系数比核质中的低一个数量级。基于扩散系数的大幅降低,我们能够将WRN和BLM归类为DNA损伤扫描蛋白。除了WRN和BLM,我们还对其他DNA损伤蛋白进行了分类,发现它们都属于两类中的一类。要么它们是类似WRN和BLM的扫描蛋白,扩散系数极低,表明存在扫描机制;要么它们几乎是自由扩散的,这表明它们仅在DNA损伤反应启动后才与DNA相互作用。