Suzuki Yuta, Ae Michiyoshi, Takenaka Shunsuke, Fujii Norihisa
Sports Biomech. 2014 Jun;13(2):144-53. doi: 10.1080/14763141.2014.910264.
The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in the support leg joint moment and moment power between side-step (SS) and cross-step (CS) cutting techniques with a prescribed 90 degrees cutting angle. Ground reaction forces (1,000Hz) and three-dimensional kinematics (250Hz) of SS and CS cutting techniques were collected from 20 male college athletes. Normalised peak knee extension moment was larger in the SS technique than in the CS technique (0.40 +/- 0.10 in SS; 0.26 +/- 0.08 in CS). In the SS technique, the knee extensors (-0.10 +/- 0.06 in SS; -0.02 +/- 0.04 in CS) and ankle plantarflexors (-0.12 +/- 0.05 in SS; -0.07 +/- 0.03 in CS) did significantly more negative work (normalised). The direction change angle (40.5 +/- 8.7 degrees in SS; 33.0 +/- 6.8 degrees in CS) and the decrease in horizontal velocity of the centre of mass (-0.63 +/- 0.23 m/s in SS; -0.31 +/- 0.23 m/s in CS) were significantly larger in the SS technique. These results suggest that the SS technique is an effective means of changing running direction at the expense of velocity of the centre of mass and that the CS technique is better for minimising the reduction in horizontal velocity of the centre of mass.
本研究的目的是调查在规定90度切入角度下,侧步(SS)和交叉步(CS)切入技术之间支撑腿关节力矩和力矩功率的差异。从20名男性大学生运动员中收集了SS和CS切入技术的地面反作用力(1000Hz)和三维运动学数据(250Hz)。SS技术中标准化的峰值膝关节伸展力矩大于CS技术(SS为0.40±0.10;CS为0.26±0.08)。在SS技术中,膝关节伸肌(SS为-0.10±0.06;CS为-0.02±0.04)和踝关节跖屈肌(SS为-0.12±0.05;CS为-0.07±0.03)做的负功(标准化)明显更多。SS技术中的方向改变角度(SS为40.5±8.7度;CS为33.0±6.8度)和质心水平速度的降低(SS为-0.63±0.23m/s;CS为-0.31±0.23m/s)明显更大。这些结果表明,SS技术是以牺牲质心速度为代价改变跑步方向的有效手段,而CS技术更有利于最小化质心水平速度的降低。