Herzog Thomas J, Alvarez Ronald D, Secord Angeles, Goff Barbara A, Mannel Robert S, Monk Bradley J, Coleman Robert L
University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Gynecol Oncol. 2014 Oct;135(1):3-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.08.004. Epub 2014 Aug 12.
To explore and facilitate the multifaceted process of drug development and regulatory approval in ovarian cancer.
The Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) recently sought and received input from multiple stakeholders including the National Cancer Institute's (NCI) Clinical Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), pharmaceutical industry, and patient advocates. This whitepaper is the work product and opinion solely of the SGO.
This document summarizes the SGO's interpretation of these meetings and the current regulatory environment where there has been a paucity of recent approvals in the United States. It provides guidance in clinical trial design with the express purpose of encouraging novel drug development in ovarian cancer. Points of emphasis include: ovarian cancer heterogeneity (histologic subtypes and molecular genetic alterations), clinical trial design elements, surrogate as well as composite endpoints, and the four principles of clinical drug development (unmet medical need, discovery, safety, and efficacy).
There has been an evolution in the acceptance of surrogate endpoints depending upon the clinical setting in ovarian cancer. While overall survival (OS) remains the most objective clinical trial endpoint, there is now realization that demanding OS as the primary endpoint has many obstacles. Ovarian cancer is a heterogeneous disease that is now divided by histologic subtypes. Future registration strategies will need to address disease heterogeneity. The exploration of currently acceptable clinical trial endpoints and alternative regulatory strategies will hopefully stimulate interest in novel drug development for patients with ovarian cancer.
探索并推动卵巢癌药物研发及监管审批的多方面进程。
妇科肿瘤学会(SGO)近期向包括美国国立癌症研究所(NCI)的临床治疗评估项目(CTEP)、食品药品监督管理局(FDA)、制药行业及患者权益倡导者在内的多个利益相关方征求并获取了意见。本白皮书完全是SGO的工作成果及观点。
本文档总结了SGO对这些会议以及当前监管环境(美国近期获批药物较少)的解读。它为临床试验设计提供指导,明确目的是鼓励卵巢癌新药研发。重点内容包括:卵巢癌异质性(组织学亚型和分子遗传学改变)、临床试验设计要素、替代终点以及复合终点,还有临床药物研发的四项原则(未满足的医疗需求、发现、安全性和有效性)。
根据卵巢癌的临床情况,对替代终点的接受程度有所演变。虽然总生存期(OS)仍然是最客观的临床试验终点,但现在意识到将OS作为主要终点存在诸多障碍。卵巢癌是一种异质性疾病,现在按组织学亚型划分。未来的注册策略需要应对疾病异质性。探索当前可接受的临床试验终点和替代监管策略有望激发对卵巢癌患者新药研发的兴趣。