Centre for Crop Systems Analysis, Wageningen University, PO Box 430, 6700 AK, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
New Phytol. 2015 Jan;205(1):429-39. doi: 10.1111/nph.12984. Epub 2014 Aug 15.
Different genotypes often exhibit opposite plastic responses in the timing of the onset of flowering with increasing plant density. In experimental studies, selection for accelerated flowering is generally found. By contrast, game theoretical studies predict that there should be selection for delayed flowering when competition increases. Combining different optimality criteria, the conditions under which accelerated or delayed flowering in response to density would be selected for are analysed with a logistic growth simulation model. To maximize seed production at the whole-stand level (simple optimization), selection should lead to accelerated flowering at high plant density, unless very short growing seasons select for similar onset of flowering at all densities. By contrast, selection of relative individual fitness will lead to delayed flowering when season length is long and/or growth rates are high. These different results give a potential explanation for the observed differences in direction of the plastic responses within and between species, including homeostasis, as a result of the effect of the variation in season length on the benefits of delayed flowering. This suggests that limited plasticity can evolve without the costs and limits that are currently thought to constrain the evolution of plasticity.
不同的基因型在植物密度增加时开花时间的可塑性反应往往表现出相反的特征。在实验研究中,通常会发现对加速开花的选择。相比之下,博弈论研究预测,当竞争加剧时,应该会选择延迟开花。通过结合不同的最优性标准,利用逻辑增长模拟模型分析了对密度做出加速或延迟开花反应的条件。为了使整个植株水平的种子产量最大化(简单优化),在植物密度高的情况下,选择应该导致开花加速,除非非常短的生长季节在所有密度下都选择类似的开花起始。相比之下,当生长季节长和/或生长速率高时,选择相对个体适应性将导致开花延迟。这些不同的结果为观察到的种内和种间可塑性反应方向的差异提供了一个潜在的解释,包括作为生长季节长度变化对延迟开花益处影响的结果,表现出了同形性。这表明,在没有目前认为限制可塑性进化的成本和限制的情况下,有限的可塑性可以进化。