Caplan Jeremy B, Madan Christopher R, Bedwell Darren J
Department of Psychology, Biological Sciences Building, P217, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2E9, Canada,
Psychon Bull Rev. 2015 Apr;22(2):483-91. doi: 10.3758/s13423-014-0701-7.
Attributes of words, such as frequency and imageability, can influence memory for order. In serial recall, Hulme, Stuart, Brown, and Morin (Journal of Memory and Language, 49(4), 500-518, 2003) found that high-frequency words were recalled worse, and low-frequency words better, when embedded in alternating lists than pure lists. This is predicted by associative chaining, wherein each recalled list-item becomes a recall-cue for the next item. However, Hulme, Stuart, Brown, and Morin (Journal of Memory and Language, 49(4), 500-518, 2003) argued their findings supported positional-coding models, wherein items are linked to a representation of position, with no direct associations between items. They suggested their serial-position effects were due to pre-experimental semantic similarity between pairs of items, which depended on frequency, or a complex tradeoff between item- and order-coding (Morin, Poirier, Fortin, & Hulme, Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 13(4), 724-729, 2006). We replicated the smooth serial-position effects, but accounts based on pre-existing similarity or item-order tradeoffs were untenable. Alternative accounts based, on imageability, phonological and lexical neighbourhood sizes were also ruled out. The standard chaining account predicts that if accuracy is conditionalized on whether the prior item was correct, the word-frequency effect should reappear in alternating lists; however, this prediction was not borne out, challenging this retrieval-based chaining account. We describe a new account, whereby frequency influences the strengths of item-item associations, symmetrically, during study. A manipulation of word-imageability also produced a pattern consistent with item-item cueing at study, but left room for effects of imageability at the final stage of recall. These findings provide further support for the contribution of associative chaining to serial-recall behaviour and show that item-properties may influence serial-recall in multiple ways.
词汇的属性,如词频和可意象性,会影响对顺序的记忆。在系列回忆中,休姆、斯图尔特、布朗和莫林(《记忆与语言杂志》,2003年第49卷第4期,第500 - 518页)发现,当高频词嵌入交替列表而非纯列表时,其回忆效果较差,而低频词的回忆效果较好。这是由联想链理论预测的,即每个被回忆出的列表项会成为下一项的回忆线索。然而,休姆、斯图尔特、布朗和莫林(《记忆与语言杂志》,2003年第49卷第4期,第500 - 518页)认为他们的研究结果支持位置编码模型,即项目与位置表征相联系,项目之间没有直接关联。他们认为系列位置效应是由于项目对之间实验前的语义相似性,这取决于词频,或者取决于项目编码与顺序编码之间的复杂权衡(莫林、波里耶、福尔坦和休姆,《心理物理学通报与评论》,2006年第13卷第4期,第724 - 729页)。我们重复了平滑的系列位置效应,但基于先前相似性或项目 - 顺序权衡的解释是站不住脚的。基于可意象性、语音和词汇邻域大小的替代解释也被排除。标准的联想链理论预测,如果准确性取决于前一项是否正确,那么词频效应应该在交替列表中再次出现;然而,这一预测并未得到证实,这对基于检索的联想链理论提出了挑战。我们描述了一种新的解释,即词频在学习过程中对称地影响项目 - 项目关联的强度。对词的可意象性的操纵也产生了一种与学习时项目 - 项目提示一致的模式,但在回忆的最后阶段仍存在可意象性的影响空间。这些发现为联想链对系列回忆行为的贡献提供了进一步支持,并表明项目属性可能以多种方式影响系列回忆。