Saint-Aubin Jean, Poirier Marie
Department of Psychology, Université de Moncton, Moncton, New Brunswick, Canada E1A 3E9.
Memory. 2005 Apr-May;13(3-4):325-32. doi: 10.1080/09658210344000369.
In immediate serial recall, high-frequency words are better recalled than low-frequency words. A prevalent interpretation of this effect suggests that, at the point of recall, degraded representations undergo a reconstruction process calling upon long-term knowledge of the to-be-remembered items. Recently, Stuart and Hulme (2000) following Deese (1960), suggested that high-frequency items are better recalled due to their better long-term associative links. Their results revealed that a familiarisation procedure involving repeated presentations of the to-be-remembered items in pairs abolished the usual frequency effect. In the experiment reported here, an alternative interpretation of this result is examined. Prior to the memory task, subjects received either no familiarisation, item familiarisation, or pair familiarisation. Both item and pair familiarisation improved the item recall of low-frequency items to the same extent, suggesting that increased familiarity can account for the co-occurrence effect.
在即时系列回忆中,高频词比低频词更容易被回忆起来。对这一效应的普遍解释表明,在回忆时,退化的表征会经历一个重建过程,该过程需要调用对要记忆项目的长期知识。最近,斯图尔特和休姆(2000年)继迪斯(1960年)之后提出,高频项目由于其更好的长期联想联系而更容易被回忆起来。他们的结果表明,一种涉及将待记忆项目成对重复呈现的熟悉化程序消除了通常的频率效应。在此报告的实验中,对这一结果的另一种解释进行了检验。在记忆任务之前,受试者要么没有接受熟悉化,要么接受项目熟悉化,要么接受成对熟悉化。项目熟悉化和成对熟悉化都同样程度地提高了低频项目的项目回忆率,这表明熟悉度的提高可以解释共现效应。