Suppr超能文献

在反应准备过程中,分离反应选择和任务预期对皮质脊髓抑制的影响。

Dissociating the influence of response selection and task anticipation on corticospinal suppression during response preparation.

作者信息

Duque Julie, Labruna Ludovica, Cazares Christian, Ivry Richard B

机构信息

Cognition and Actions Laboratory, Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Ave Mounier, 53, Bte B1.53.04, 1200 Brussels, Belgium.

Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, USA; Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, USA.

出版信息

Neuropsychologia. 2014 Dec;65:287-96. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.08.006. Epub 2014 Aug 13.

Abstract

Motor behavior requires selecting between potential actions. The role of inhibition in response selection has frequently been examined in tasks in which participants are engaged in some advance preparation prior to the presentation of an imperative signal. Under such conditions, inhibition could be related to processes associated with response selection, or to more general inhibitory processes that are engaged in high states of anticipation. In Experiment 1, we manipulated the degree of anticipatory preparation. Participants performed a choice reaction time task that required choosing between a movement of the left or right index finger, and used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to elicit motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in the left hand agonist. In high anticipation blocks, a non-informative cue (e.g., fixation marker) preceded the imperative; in low anticipation blocks, there was no cue and participants were required to divide their attention between two tasks to further reduce anticipation. MEPs were substantially reduced before the imperative signal in high anticipation blocks. In contrast, in low anticipation blocks, MEPs remained unchanged before the imperative signal but showed a marked suppression right after the onset of the imperative. This effect occurred regardless of whether the imperative had signalled a left or right hand response. After this initial inhibition, left MEPs increased when the left hand was selected and remained suppressed when the right hand was selected. We obtained similar results in Experiment 2 except that the persistent left MEP suppression when the left hand was not selected was attenuated when the alternative response involved a non-homologous effector (right foot). These results indicate that, even in the absence of an anticipatory period, inhibitory mechanisms are engaged during response selection, possibly to prevent the occurrence of premature and inappropriate responses during a competitive selection process.

摘要

运动行为需要在潜在动作之间进行选择。抑制在反应选择中的作用经常在这样的任务中得到检验,即参与者在呈现指令信号之前进行了一些预先准备。在这种情况下,抑制可能与反应选择相关的过程有关,或者与处于高度预期状态时所涉及的更一般的抑制过程有关。在实验1中,我们操纵了预期准备的程度。参与者执行了一个选择反应时任务,需要在左手或右手食指的动作之间进行选择,并使用经颅磁刺激(TMS)来诱发左手主动肌的运动诱发电位(MEP)。在高预期组中,一个非信息性提示(例如,注视标记)在指令之前出现;在低预期组中,没有提示,参与者需要在两项任务之间分配注意力以进一步降低预期。在高预期组中,指令信号之前MEP大幅降低。相比之下,在低预期组中,指令信号之前MEP保持不变,但在指令信号开始后立即出现明显抑制。无论指令信号指示的是左手还是右手反应,这种效应都会出现。在这种初始抑制之后,当选择左手时左MEP增加,而当选择右手时则保持抑制。我们在实验2中得到了类似的结果,只是当替代反应涉及非同源效应器(右脚)时,未选择左手时左MEP的持续抑制减弱。这些结果表明,即使在没有预期期的情况下,抑制机制在反应选择过程中也会起作用,可能是为了防止在竞争性选择过程中出现过早和不适当的反应。

相似文献

1
Dissociating the influence of response selection and task anticipation on corticospinal suppression during response preparation.
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Dec;65:287-96. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.08.006. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
2
Influence of Delay Period Duration on Inhibitory Processes for Response Preparation.
Cereb Cortex. 2016 Jun;26(6):2461-70. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhv069. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
3
Preparatory inhibition: Impact of choice in reaction time tasks.
Neuropsychologia. 2019 Jun;129:212-222. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.04.016. Epub 2019 Apr 20.
4
Comparison of the two cerebral hemispheres in inhibitory processes operative during movement preparation.
Neuroimage. 2016 Jan 15;125:220-232. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.10.007. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
5
Role of corticospinal suppression during motor preparation.
Cereb Cortex. 2009 Sep;19(9):2013-24. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhn230. Epub 2009 Jan 6.
7
Reward anticipation modulates primary motor cortex excitability during task preparation.
Neuroimage. 2016 Nov 15;142:483-488. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.07.013. Epub 2016 Jul 7.
9
Influence of reward on corticospinal excitability during movement preparation.
J Neurosci. 2012 Dec 12;32(50):18124-36. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1701-12.2012.
10
Investigating the effect of anticipating a startling acoustic stimulus on preparatory inhibition.
Neurophysiol Clin. 2019 Apr;49(2):137-147. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Dec 6.

引用本文的文献

2
Action Selection and Motor Decision Making: Insights from Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.
Brain Sci. 2022 May 12;12(5):639. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12050639.
3
Inhibition for gain modulation in the motor system.
Exp Brain Res. 2022 May;240(5):1295-1302. doi: 10.1007/s00221-022-06351-5. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
5
The Pause-then-Cancel model of human action-stopping: Theoretical considerations and empirical evidence.
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Oct;129:17-34. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.07.019. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
6
Motor cortex disruption delays motor processes but not deliberation about action choices.
J Neurophysiol. 2019 Oct 1;122(4):1566-1577. doi: 10.1152/jn.00163.2019. Epub 2019 Aug 14.
7
Motor Preparation for Action Inhibition: A Review of Single Pulse TMS Studies Using the Go/NoGo Paradigm.
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 21;10:340. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00340. eCollection 2019.
8
Planning face, hand, and leg movements: anatomical constraints on preparatory inhibition.
J Neurophysiol. 2019 May 1;121(5):1609-1620. doi: 10.1152/jn.00711.2018. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
9
Deficient inhibition in alcohol-dependence: let's consider the role of the motor system!
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018 Aug;43(9):1851-1858. doi: 10.1038/s41386-018-0074-0. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
10
Using a Double-Coil TMS Protocol to Assess Preparatory Inhibition Bilaterally.
Front Neurosci. 2018 Mar 8;12:139. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.00139. eCollection 2018.

本文引用的文献

1
Rapid prediction of biomechanical costs during action decisions.
J Neurophysiol. 2014 Sep 15;112(6):1256-66. doi: 10.1152/jn.00147.2014. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
2
Neural correlates of intentional and stimulus-driven inhibition: a comparison.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Feb 5;8:27. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00027. eCollection 2014.
3
Generic inhibition of the selected movement and constrained inhibition of nonselected movements during response preparation.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Feb;26(2):269-78. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00492. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
4
TMS over M1 reveals expression and selective suppression of conflicting action impulses.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2014 Jan;26(1):1-15. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00482. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
5
Top-down suppression of incompatible motor activations during response selection under conflict.
Neuroimage. 2014 Feb 1;86:138-49. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.005. Epub 2013 Aug 9.
6
Top-down inhibitory control exerted by the medial frontal cortex during action selection under conflict.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2013 Oct;25(10):1634-48. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00421. Epub 2013 May 10.
7
A computational model of inhibitory control in frontal cortex and basal ganglia.
Psychol Rev. 2013 Apr;120(2):329-55. doi: 10.1037/a0031542.
8
Influence of reward on corticospinal excitability during movement preparation.
J Neurosci. 2012 Dec 12;32(50):18124-36. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1701-12.2012.
9
How preparation changes the need for top-down control of the basal ganglia when inhibiting premature actions.
J Neurosci. 2012 Aug 8;32(32):10870-8. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0902-12.2012.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验