Duque Julie, Labruna Ludovica, Cazares Christian, Ivry Richard B
Cognition and Actions Laboratory, Institute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Ave Mounier, 53, Bte B1.53.04, 1200 Brussels, Belgium.
Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, USA; Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, USA.
Neuropsychologia. 2014 Dec;65:287-96. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.08.006. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
Motor behavior requires selecting between potential actions. The role of inhibition in response selection has frequently been examined in tasks in which participants are engaged in some advance preparation prior to the presentation of an imperative signal. Under such conditions, inhibition could be related to processes associated with response selection, or to more general inhibitory processes that are engaged in high states of anticipation. In Experiment 1, we manipulated the degree of anticipatory preparation. Participants performed a choice reaction time task that required choosing between a movement of the left or right index finger, and used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to elicit motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in the left hand agonist. In high anticipation blocks, a non-informative cue (e.g., fixation marker) preceded the imperative; in low anticipation blocks, there was no cue and participants were required to divide their attention between two tasks to further reduce anticipation. MEPs were substantially reduced before the imperative signal in high anticipation blocks. In contrast, in low anticipation blocks, MEPs remained unchanged before the imperative signal but showed a marked suppression right after the onset of the imperative. This effect occurred regardless of whether the imperative had signalled a left or right hand response. After this initial inhibition, left MEPs increased when the left hand was selected and remained suppressed when the right hand was selected. We obtained similar results in Experiment 2 except that the persistent left MEP suppression when the left hand was not selected was attenuated when the alternative response involved a non-homologous effector (right foot). These results indicate that, even in the absence of an anticipatory period, inhibitory mechanisms are engaged during response selection, possibly to prevent the occurrence of premature and inappropriate responses during a competitive selection process.
运动行为需要在潜在动作之间进行选择。抑制在反应选择中的作用经常在这样的任务中得到检验,即参与者在呈现指令信号之前进行了一些预先准备。在这种情况下,抑制可能与反应选择相关的过程有关,或者与处于高度预期状态时所涉及的更一般的抑制过程有关。在实验1中,我们操纵了预期准备的程度。参与者执行了一个选择反应时任务,需要在左手或右手食指的动作之间进行选择,并使用经颅磁刺激(TMS)来诱发左手主动肌的运动诱发电位(MEP)。在高预期组中,一个非信息性提示(例如,注视标记)在指令之前出现;在低预期组中,没有提示,参与者需要在两项任务之间分配注意力以进一步降低预期。在高预期组中,指令信号之前MEP大幅降低。相比之下,在低预期组中,指令信号之前MEP保持不变,但在指令信号开始后立即出现明显抑制。无论指令信号指示的是左手还是右手反应,这种效应都会出现。在这种初始抑制之后,当选择左手时左MEP增加,而当选择右手时则保持抑制。我们在实验2中得到了类似的结果,只是当替代反应涉及非同源效应器(右脚)时,未选择左手时左MEP的持续抑制减弱。这些结果表明,即使在没有预期期的情况下,抑制机制在反应选择过程中也会起作用,可能是为了防止在竞争性选择过程中出现过早和不适当的反应。