Suppr超能文献

腰椎伸肌的皮质运动控制在姿势和自主任务中:经颅磁刺激电流方向的影响。

Corticomotor Control of Lumbar Erector Spinae in Postural and Voluntary Tasks: The Influence of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Current Direction.

机构信息

Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (Cirris), CIUSSS de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec City, Quebec G1M 2S8, Canada.

Rehabilitation Department, University Laval, Quebec City, Quebec G1V 0A6, Canada, G1V 0A6.

出版信息

eNeuro. 2024 Feb 21;11(2). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0454-22.2023. Print 2024 Feb.

Abstract

Lumbar erector spinae (LES) contribute to spine postural and voluntary control. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) preferentially depolarizes different neural circuits depending on the direction of electrical currents evoked in the brain. Posteroanterior current (PA-TMS) and anteroposterior (AP-TMS) current would, respectively, depolarize neurons in the primary motor cortex (M1) and the premotor cortex. These regions may contribute differently to LES control. This study examined whether responses evoked by PA- and AP-TMS are different during the preparation and execution of LES voluntary and postural tasks. Participants performed a reaction time task. A Warning signal indicated to prepare to flex shoulders (postural;  = 15) or to tilt the pelvis (voluntary;  = 13) at the Go signal. Single- and paired-pulse TMS (short-interval intracortical inhibition-SICI) were applied using PA- and AP-TMS before the Warning signal (baseline), between the Warning and Go signals (preparation), or 30 ms before the LES onset (execution). Changes from baseline during preparation and execution were calculated in AP/PA-TMS. In the postural task, MEP amplitude was higher during the execution than that during preparation independently of the current direction ( = 0.0002). In the voluntary task, AP-MEP amplitude was higher during execution than that during preparation ( = 0.016). More PA inhibition (SICI) was observed in execution than that in preparation ( = 0.028). Different neural circuits are preferentially involved in the two motor tasks assessed, as suggested by different patterns of change in execution of the voluntary task (AP-TMS, increase; PA-TMS, no change). Considering that PA-TMS preferentially , it questions their importance in LES voluntary control.

摘要

竖脊肌(LES)有助于脊柱姿势和自主控制。经颅磁刺激(TMS)根据大脑中诱发的电流的方向优先去极化不同的神经回路。后前电流(PA-TMS)和前后电流(AP-TMS)将分别使初级运动皮层(M1)和运动前皮层的神经元去极化。这些区域可能对 LES 控制有不同的贡献。本研究旨在探讨在准备和执行 LES 自主和姿势任务期间,由 PA 和 AP-TMS 诱发的反应是否不同。参与者进行了反应时间任务。警告信号指示准备弯曲肩部(姿势;= 15)或倾斜骨盆(自愿;= 13)在 Go 信号。单脉冲和双脉冲 TMS(短间隔皮质内抑制-SICI)分别在警告信号之前(基线)、警告信号和 Go 信号之间(准备)或 LES 发作前 30 ms(执行)应用 PA 和 AP-TMS。在准备和执行期间,从基线计算 AP/PA-TMS 的变化。在姿势任务中,MEP 振幅在执行过程中高于准备过程,与电流方向无关(= 0.0002)。在自愿任务中,AP-MEP 振幅在执行过程中高于准备过程(= 0.016)。与准备相比,执行过程中观察到更多的 PA 抑制(SICI)(= 0.028)。不同的神经回路优先参与评估的两个运动任务,这表明自愿任务执行的变化模式不同(AP-TMS 增加;PA-TMS 不变)。考虑到 PA-TMS 优先,这对其在 LES 自愿控制中的重要性提出了质疑。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/901b/10883751/c4f27423992d/eneuro-11-ENEURO.0454-22.2023-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验