Smolders Roel, Koch Holger M, Moos Rebecca K, Cocker John, Jones Kate, Warren Nick, Levy Len, Bevan Ruth, Hays Sean M, Aylward Lesa L
VITO, Boeretang 200, Mol B-2400, Belgium.
Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance, Institute of the Ruhr-University Bochum (IPA), Germany.
Toxicol Lett. 2014 Dec 1;231(2):249-60. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2014.08.014. Epub 2014 Aug 13.
The aim of the current HBM-study is to further the understanding of the impact of inter- and intra-individual variability in HBM surveys as it may have implications for the design and interpretation of the study outcomes. As spot samples only provide a snapshot in time of the concentrations of chemicals in an individual, it remains unclear to what extent intra-individual variability plays a role in the overall variability of population-wide HBM surveys. The current paper describes the results of an intensive biomonitoring study, in which all individual urine samples of 8 individuals were collected over a 6-day sampling period (a total of 352 unique samples). By analyzing different metals (As, Cd, Mn, Ni) in each individual sample, inter- and intra-individual variability for these four metals could be determined, and the relationships between exposure, internal dose, and sampling protocol assessed. Although the range of biomarker values for different metals was well within the normal range reported in large-scale population surveys, large intra-individual differences over a 6-day period could also be observed. Typically, measured biomarker values span at least an order of magnitude within an individual, and more if specific exposure episodes could be identified. Fish consumption for example caused a twenty- to thirty-fold increase in urinary As-levels over a period of 2-6h. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were typically low for uncorrected biomarker values (between 0.104 and 0.460 for the 4 metals), but improved when corrected for creatinine or specific gravity (SG). The results show that even though urine is a preferred matrix for HBM studies, there are certain methodological issues that need to be taken into account in the interpretation of urinary biomarker data, related to the intrinsic variability of the urination process itself, the relationship between exposure events and biomarker quantification, and the timing of sampling. When setting up HBM-projects, this expected relationship between individual exposure episode and urinary biomarker concentration needs to be taken into account.
当前健康行为模型(HBM)研究的目的是深化对HBM调查中个体间和个体内变异性影响的理解,因为这可能对研究结果的设计和解释产生影响。由于即时样本仅提供个体内化学物质浓度的一个时间点快照,个体内变异性在全人群HBM调查的总体变异性中所起的作用仍不明确。本文描述了一项强化生物监测研究的结果,在该研究中,在6天的采样期内收集了8个人的所有个体尿液样本(总共352个独特样本)。通过分析每个个体样本中的不同金属(砷、镉、锰、镍),可以确定这四种金属的个体间和个体内变异性,并评估暴露、内剂量和采样方案之间的关系。尽管不同金属的生物标志物值范围完全在大规模人群调查报道的正常范围内,但在6天期间也观察到了较大的个体内差异。通常,个体内测得的生物标志物值至少跨越一个数量级,如果能识别出特定的暴露事件则差异更大。例如,食用鱼类在2至6小时内使尿砷水平增加了20至30倍。未校正的生物标志物值的组内相关系数(ICC)通常较低(四种金属的ICC在0.104至0.460之间),但在经肌酐或比重(SG)校正后有所改善。结果表明,尽管尿液是HBM研究的首选基质,但在解释尿液生物标志物数据时仍有一些方法学问题需要考虑,这些问题与排尿过程本身的内在变异性、暴露事件与生物标志物定量之间的关系以及采样时间有关。在开展HBM项目时,需要考虑个体暴露事件与尿液生物标志物浓度之间的这种预期关系。