Danielsson Anna-Karin, Eriksson Anna-Karin, Allebeck Peter
Karolinska Institute, Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Social Medicine, SE-171 29 Stockholm, Sweden; Centre of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Stockholm County Council.
Addict Behav. 2014 Dec;39(12):1846-68. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.06.007. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
A systematic review of the literature on telephone or internet-based support for smoking, alcohol use or gambling was performed. Studies were included if they met the following criteria: The design being a randomized control trail (RCT), focused on effects of telephone or web based interventions, focused on pure telephone or internet-based self-help, provided information on alcohol or tobacco consumption, or gambling behavior, as an outcome, had a follow-up period of at least 3months, and included adults. Seventy-four relevant studies were found; 36 addressed the effect of internet interventions on alcohol consumption, 21 on smoking and 1 on gambling, 12 the effect of helplines on smoking, 2 on alcohol consumption, and 2 on gambling. Telephone helplines can have an effect on tobacco smoking, but there is no evidence of the effects for alcohol use or gambling. There are some positive findings regarding internet-based support for heavy alcohol use among U.S. college students. However, evidence on the effects of internet-based support for smoking, alcohol use or gambling are to a large extent inconsistent.
我们对有关通过电话或互联网提供的针对吸烟、饮酒或赌博的支持的文献进行了系统综述。符合以下标准的研究被纳入:设计为随机对照试验(RCT),聚焦于基于电话或网络干预的效果,聚焦于单纯基于电话或互联网的自助,提供有关酒精或烟草消费或赌博行为的信息作为结果,随访期至少为3个月,且纳入成年人。共找到74项相关研究;36项涉及网络干预对饮酒的影响,21项涉及对吸烟的影响,1项涉及对赌博的影响,12项涉及热线对吸烟的影响,2项涉及对饮酒的影响,2项涉及对赌博的影响。电话热线对吸烟可能有影响,但没有证据表明其对饮酒或赌博有影响。关于美国大学生中基于互联网对重度饮酒的支持有一些积极发现。然而,关于基于互联网对吸烟、饮酒或赌博的支持效果的证据在很大程度上并不一致。