文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

功能性消化不良:餐后不适综合征(PDS)患者症状评估问卷开发焦点小组的结果

Functional dyspepsia: outcome of focus groups for the development of a questionnaire for symptom assessment in patients suffering from postprandial distress syndrome (PDS).

作者信息

Carbone F, Holvoet L, Vandenberghe A, Tack J

机构信息

KU Leuven, TARGID, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014 Sep;26(9):1266-74. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12381. Epub 2014 Jul 29.


DOI:10.1111/nmo.12381
PMID:25130784
Abstract

BACKGROUND: To date, no patient reported outcomes (PRO) instrument is available for evaluation of treatment efficacy in functional dyspepsia (FD)/postprandial distress syndrome (PDS). The aim of our study was to perform focus group interviews for the development of a new questionnaire for assessing symptom pattern and severity in PDS. METHODS: Random ambulatory patients diagnosed with FD/PDS based on Rome III criteria and no predominant gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms were invited to participate. Focus group sessions were organized where patients reported and discussed their symptoms, facilitated by an experienced physician. After reaching saturation of identified symptom items, questions for a pilot PRO instrument were drafted and evaluated in cognitive interviews for relevance, clarity, and consistency. KEY RESULTS: Of 225 screened patients, 26 patients were diagnosed with PDS without overlapping GERD as single final diagnosis. Fifteen of these (87% female, 48 ± 3.2 years) participated in one of three focus groups. All (100%) confirmed experiencing symptoms that were triggered or aggravated by ingestion of a meal, corresponding to early satiation (100%), and postprandial fullness (100%). In addition reported gastroduodenal symptoms were nausea (40%, postprandial in all, interprandial in 20%), upper abdominal bloating (33%), excessive belching (27%), and vomiting (13%). Epigastric pain and burning were present in respectively 20% and 13%. Non-gastroduodenal symptoms that patients reported included heartburn (33%, but mostly sporadic), weight loss (93%, on average 5.0 ± 1.7 kg), and fatigue (67%). Questions evaluating these symptoms were validated in 15 cognitive interviews. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: This focus group study confirms symptoms corresponding to postprandial fullness and early satiation as the key items for developing a PRO for PDS.

摘要

背景:迄今为止,尚无患者报告结局(PRO)工具可用于评估功能性消化不良(FD)/餐后不适综合征(PDS)的治疗效果。我们研究的目的是进行焦点小组访谈,以开发一种用于评估PDS症状模式和严重程度的新问卷。 方法:邀请根据罗马III标准诊断为FD/PDS且无主要胃食管反流病(GERD)症状的随机门诊患者参与。组织焦点小组会议,由经验丰富的医生协助患者报告和讨论他们的症状。在确定的症状项目达到饱和后,起草用于初步PRO工具的问题,并在认知访谈中评估其相关性、清晰度和一致性。 主要结果:在225名筛查患者中,26名患者被诊断为PDS,无重叠GERD作为单一最终诊断。其中15名(87%为女性,48±3.2岁)参加了三个焦点小组之一。所有患者(100%)均确认有进食引发或加重的症状,分别对应早饱(100%)和餐后饱胀感(100%)。此外,报告的胃十二指肠症状包括恶心(40%,均为餐后,20%为餐间)、上腹部胀满(33%)、过度嗳气(27%)和呕吐(13%)。上腹部疼痛和烧灼感分别为20%和13%。患者报告的非胃十二指肠症状包括烧心(33%,但大多为偶发)、体重减轻(93%,平均5.0±1.7kg)和疲劳(67%)。评估这些症状的问题在15次认知访谈中得到验证。 结论与推论:该焦点小组研究证实,餐后饱胀感和早饱对应的症状是开发PDS的PRO的关键项目。

相似文献

[1]
Functional dyspepsia: outcome of focus groups for the development of a questionnaire for symptom assessment in patients suffering from postprandial distress syndrome (PDS).

Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014-9

[2]
Rome III functional dyspepsia subdivision in PDS and EPS: recognizing postprandial symptoms reduces overlap.

Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015-8

[3]
Prevalence and symptom pattern of pathologic esophageal acid reflux in patients with functional dyspepsia based on the Rome III criteria.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2010-9-7

[4]
The use of pictograms improves symptom evaluation by patients with functional dyspepsia.

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014-9

[5]
Symptom overlap between postprandial distress and epigastric pain syndromes of the Rome III dyspepsia classification.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2013-4-9

[6]
Fasting and postprandial gastric sensorimotor activity in functional dyspepsia: postprandial distress vs. epigastric pain syndrome.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2014-10

[7]
Analysis of Postprandial Symptom Patterns in Subgroups of Patients With Rome III or Rome IV Functional Dyspepsia.

Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020-4

[8]
In functional dyspepsia, hypersensitivity to postprandial distention correlates with meal-related symptom severity.

Gastroenterology. 2013-5-20

[9]
Pathophysiological Abnormalities in Functional Dyspepsia Subgroups According to the Rome III Criteria.

Am J Gastroenterol. 2017-1

[10]
Validation of the Leuven Postprandial Distress Scale, a questionnaire for symptom assessment in the functional dyspepsia/postprandial distress syndrome.

Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016-8-12

引用本文的文献

[1]
Patient-reported outcome measures in functional dyspepsia: a systematic review and COSMIN analysis.

BMC Gastroenterol. 2023-9-19

[2]
Developing a Scale for the Evaluation of People With Post-prandial Distress Syndrome.

Front Public Health. 2021

[3]
Altered duodenal bile salt concentration and receptor expression in functional dyspepsia.

United European Gastroenterol J. 2018-11

[4]
Development of a Symptom-Focused Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Functional Dyspepsia: The Functional Dyspepsia Symptom Diary (FDSD).

Am J Gastroenterol. 2017-9-19

[5]
Tailored therapy guided by multichannel intraluminal impedance pH monitoring for refractory non-erosive reflux disease.

Cell Death Dis. 2017-9-7

[6]
Discrepancies between upper GI symptoms described by those who have them and their identification by conventional medical terminology: a survey of sufferers in four countries.

Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016-4

[7]
Assessing patient reported outcome measures: A practical guide for gastroenterologists.

United European Gastroenterol J. 2014-12

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索