Carbone F, Holvoet L, Vandenberghe A, Tack J
KU Leuven, TARGID, Leuven, Belgium.
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2014 Sep;26(9):1266-74. doi: 10.1111/nmo.12381. Epub 2014 Jul 29.
BACKGROUND: To date, no patient reported outcomes (PRO) instrument is available for evaluation of treatment efficacy in functional dyspepsia (FD)/postprandial distress syndrome (PDS). The aim of our study was to perform focus group interviews for the development of a new questionnaire for assessing symptom pattern and severity in PDS. METHODS: Random ambulatory patients diagnosed with FD/PDS based on Rome III criteria and no predominant gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms were invited to participate. Focus group sessions were organized where patients reported and discussed their symptoms, facilitated by an experienced physician. After reaching saturation of identified symptom items, questions for a pilot PRO instrument were drafted and evaluated in cognitive interviews for relevance, clarity, and consistency. KEY RESULTS: Of 225 screened patients, 26 patients were diagnosed with PDS without overlapping GERD as single final diagnosis. Fifteen of these (87% female, 48 ± 3.2 years) participated in one of three focus groups. All (100%) confirmed experiencing symptoms that were triggered or aggravated by ingestion of a meal, corresponding to early satiation (100%), and postprandial fullness (100%). In addition reported gastroduodenal symptoms were nausea (40%, postprandial in all, interprandial in 20%), upper abdominal bloating (33%), excessive belching (27%), and vomiting (13%). Epigastric pain and burning were present in respectively 20% and 13%. Non-gastroduodenal symptoms that patients reported included heartburn (33%, but mostly sporadic), weight loss (93%, on average 5.0 ± 1.7 kg), and fatigue (67%). Questions evaluating these symptoms were validated in 15 cognitive interviews. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: This focus group study confirms symptoms corresponding to postprandial fullness and early satiation as the key items for developing a PRO for PDS.
背景:迄今为止,尚无患者报告结局(PRO)工具可用于评估功能性消化不良(FD)/餐后不适综合征(PDS)的治疗效果。我们研究的目的是进行焦点小组访谈,以开发一种用于评估PDS症状模式和严重程度的新问卷。 方法:邀请根据罗马III标准诊断为FD/PDS且无主要胃食管反流病(GERD)症状的随机门诊患者参与。组织焦点小组会议,由经验丰富的医生协助患者报告和讨论他们的症状。在确定的症状项目达到饱和后,起草用于初步PRO工具的问题,并在认知访谈中评估其相关性、清晰度和一致性。 主要结果:在225名筛查患者中,26名患者被诊断为PDS,无重叠GERD作为单一最终诊断。其中15名(87%为女性,48±3.2岁)参加了三个焦点小组之一。所有患者(100%)均确认有进食引发或加重的症状,分别对应早饱(100%)和餐后饱胀感(100%)。此外,报告的胃十二指肠症状包括恶心(40%,均为餐后,20%为餐间)、上腹部胀满(33%)、过度嗳气(27%)和呕吐(13%)。上腹部疼痛和烧灼感分别为20%和13%。患者报告的非胃十二指肠症状包括烧心(33%,但大多为偶发)、体重减轻(93%,平均5.0±1.7kg)和疲劳(67%)。评估这些症状的问题在15次认知访谈中得到验证。 结论与推论:该焦点小组研究证实,餐后饱胀感和早饱对应的症状是开发PDS的PRO的关键项目。
Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015-8
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2014-9
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020-4
Am J Gastroenterol. 2017-1
BMC Gastroenterol. 2023-9-19
Front Public Health. 2021
United European Gastroenterol J. 2018-11
United European Gastroenterol J. 2014-12