Suppr超能文献

心因性非癫痫性发作:我们应该将对抗癫痫药物的反应作为诊断的警示信号吗?

Psychogenic nonepileptic seizures: should we use response to AEDS as a red flag for the diagnosis?

作者信息

Alessi Rudá, Valente Kette D

机构信息

Center for the Study of Cognitive and Psychiatric Disorders in Epilepsy, Clinics' Hospital, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil; Laboratory of Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Psychiatry, Clinics' Hospital, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Center for the Study of Cognitive and Psychiatric Disorders in Epilepsy, Clinics' Hospital, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil; Laboratory of Clinical Neurophysiology, Department of Psychiatry, Clinics' Hospital, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil; LIM 21, Laboratory of Neuroimaging in Neuropsychiatric Disorders, Department of Psychiatry, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Seizure. 2014 Nov;23(10):906-8. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2014.07.016. Epub 2014 Aug 1.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Lack of response to anti-epileptic drugs (AEDS) is considered a "red flag" pointing to a diagnosis of Psychogenic Nonepileptic Seizures (PNES). On the other hand, placebo effects are relevant in any medical condition with a complex psychosocial component. We aimed to evaluate the presence and frequency of a placebo response in patients with sole PNES and explore its impact on diagnostic delay.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of 102 patients referred for video EEG monitoring and diagnosed with PNES. Patients with PNES and epilepsy were excluded. The response to AEDs was analyzed according to patients' reports and medical records. Patients were classified, according to the response to AEDs, in two groups: responders (patients achieving remission) and non-responders. Then, we compared the diagnostic delay from the first event to the final diagnosis between these groups.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients (79.7%) with sole PNES who were using AEDs were identified. Twenty-two patients (46.8%) had reported complete or partial remission of PNES with mean response duration of 7.2 months (SD+9.6 months). The time delay of the diagnosis in the AED responder group was 10.6 years; the delay in non-responders was 5.6 years (p=0.035).

CONCLUSION

Patients with sole PNES receiving AEDs can go into PNES remission. A favorable response to AEDs is likely to be interpreted as supporting a diagnosis of epilepsy and is associated with diagnostic delay. Physicians should bear in mind that patients with PNES may be particularly vulnerable to placebo effects.

摘要

目的

对抗癫痫药物(AEDs)无反应被视为指向精神性非癫痫性发作(PNES)诊断的“危险信号”。另一方面,安慰剂效应在任何具有复杂心理社会因素的医疗状况中都很重要。我们旨在评估单纯PNES患者中安慰剂反应的存在情况和频率,并探讨其对诊断延迟的影响。

方法

我们回顾了102例因视频脑电图监测而被转诊并诊断为PNES的患者的病历。排除患有PNES和癫痫的患者。根据患者报告和病历分析对AEDs的反应。根据对AEDs的反应,将患者分为两组:有反应者(实现缓解的患者)和无反应者。然后,我们比较了这两组从首次发作到最终诊断的诊断延迟情况。

结果

确定了47例使用AEDs的单纯PNES患者(79.7%)。22例患者(46.8%)报告PNES完全或部分缓解,平均反应持续时间为7.2个月(标准差+9.6个月)。AED有反应组的诊断延迟时间为10.6年;无反应组的延迟时间为5.6年(p = 0.035)。

结论

接受AEDs治疗的单纯PNES患者可能会出现PNES缓解。对AEDs的良好反应可能会被解释为支持癫痫的诊断,并与诊断延迟相关。医生应牢记,PNES患者可能特别容易受到安慰剂效应的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验