• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癫痫、分离性发作和混合性发作:与视频脑电图时间的关联。

Epilepsy, dissociative seizures, and mixed: Associations with time to video-EEG.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States; Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States.

出版信息

Seizure. 2021 Mar;86:116-122. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2021.02.002. Epub 2021 Feb 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.seizure.2021.02.002
PMID:33601302
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7979505/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Video-electroencephalographic monitoring (VEM) is a core component to the diagnosis and evaluation of epilepsy and dissociative seizures (DS)-also known as functional or psychogenic seizures-but VEM evaluation often occurs later than recommended. To understand why delays occur, we compared how patient-reported clinical factors were associated with time from first seizure to VEM (TVEM) in patients with epilepsy, DS or mixed.

METHODS

We acquired data from 1245 consecutive patients with epilepsy, VEM-documented DS or mixed epilepsy and DS. We used multivariate log-normal regression with recursive feature elimination (RFE) to evaluate which of 76 clinical factors interacting with patients' diagnoses were associated with TVEM.

RESULTS

The mean and median TVEM were 14.6 years and 10 years, respectively (IQR 3-23 years). In the multivariate RFE model, the factors associated with longer TVEM in all patients included unemployment and not student status, more antiseizure medications (current and past), concussion, and ictal behavior suggestive of temporal lobe epilepsy. Average TVEM was shorter for DS than epilepsy, particularly for patients with depression, anxiety, migraines, and eye closure. Average TVEM was longer specifically for patients with DS taking more medications, more seizure types, non-metastatic cancer, and with other psychiatric comorbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

In all patients with seizures, trials of numerous antiseizure medications, unemployment and non-student status was associated with longer TVEM. These associations highlight a disconnect between International League Against Epilepsy practice parameters and observed referral patterns in epilepsy. In patients with dissociative seizures, some but not all factors classically associated with DS reduced TVEM.

摘要

目的

视频脑电图监测(VEM)是癫痫和分离性发作(DS)——也称为功能性或心因性发作——诊断和评估的核心组成部分,但 VEM 评估往往晚于推荐时间。为了了解为什么会出现延迟,我们比较了患者报告的临床因素与癫痫、DS 或混合性患者首次发作至 VEM(TVEM)的时间之间的关系。

方法

我们从 1245 例连续癫痫患者、有 VEM 记录的 DS 或混合性癫痫和 DS 患者中获取数据。我们使用带有递归特征消除(RFE)的多元对数正态回归来评估与 TVEM 相关的 76 个临床因素与患者诊断的相互作用。

结果

平均和中位数 TVEM 分别为 14.6 年和 10 年(IQR 3-23 年)。在多元 RFE 模型中,所有患者中与 TVEM 较长相关的因素包括失业和非学生身份、更多的抗癫痫药物(目前和过去)、脑震荡和提示颞叶癫痫的发作行为。与癫痫相比,DS 的平均 TVEM 更短,特别是对于患有抑郁、焦虑、偏头痛和闭眼的患者。DS 患者服用更多药物、更多发作类型、非转移性癌症和其他精神共病的平均 TVEM 更长。

结论

在所有有发作的患者中,尝试多种抗癫痫药物、失业和非学生身份与 TVEM 较长有关。这些关联突出了国际抗癫痫联盟实践参数与癫痫观察到的转诊模式之间的脱节。在分离性发作患者中,一些但不是所有与 DS 相关的经典因素会缩短 TVEM。

相似文献

1
Epilepsy, dissociative seizures, and mixed: Associations with time to video-EEG.癫痫、分离性发作和混合性发作:与视频脑电图时间的关联。
Seizure. 2021 Mar;86:116-122. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2021.02.002. Epub 2021 Feb 9.
2
Factors associated with delay to video-EEG in dissociative seizures.与分离性癫痫视频脑电图延迟相关的因素。
Seizure. 2021 Mar;86:155-160. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2021.02.018. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
3
Objective score from initial interview identifies patients with probable dissociative seizures.初始访谈的客观评分可识别出可能存在分离性发作的患者。
Epilepsy Behav. 2020 Dec;113:107525. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107525. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
4
Reliability of additional reported seizure manifestations to identify dissociative seizures.辅助报告的发作表现对识别分离性发作的可靠性。
Epilepsy Behav. 2021 Feb;115:107696. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107696. Epub 2021 Jan 1.
5
Antiepileptic drug monotherapy for epilepsy: a network meta-analysis of individual participant data.抗癫痫药物单药治疗癫痫:一项个体参与者数据的网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 1;4(4):CD011412. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011412.pub4.
6
Idiopathic (Genetic) Generalized Epilepsy特发性(遗传性)全身性癫痫
7
Prognosis of adults and children following a first unprovoked seizure.首次无诱因发作后成人和儿童的预后。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jan 23;1(1):CD013847. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013847.pub2.
8
Carbamazepine versus phenytoin monotherapy for epilepsy: an individual participant data review.卡马西平与苯妥英钠单药治疗癫痫:个体参与者数据回顾
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 27;2(2):CD001911. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001911.pub3.
9
Antiepileptic drug monotherapy for epilepsy: a network meta-analysis of individual participant data.癫痫的抗癫痫药物单药治疗:个体参与者数据的网状荟萃分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 15;12(12):CD011412. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011412.pub3.
10
Antiepileptic drug monotherapy for epilepsy: a network meta-analysis of individual participant data.癫痫的抗癫痫药物单药治疗:个体参与者数据的网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 29;6(6):CD011412. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011412.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Dissociative seizures mimicking epileptic seizures: diagnostic challenges in a case with atypical eye movements.模仿癫痫发作的分离性发作:一例伴有非典型眼球运动病例的诊断挑战
Acta Epileptol. 2025 Mar 4;7(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s42494-025-00210-w.
2
Supervised machine learning compared to large language models for identifying functional seizures from medical records.与大语言模型相比,监督式机器学习用于从医疗记录中识别功能性癫痫发作
Epilepsia. 2025 Apr;66(4):1155-1164. doi: 10.1111/epi.18272. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
3
Clinical Functional Seizure Score (CFSS): a simple algorithm for clinicians to suspect functional seizures.

本文引用的文献

1
Reliability of additional reported seizure manifestations to identify dissociative seizures.辅助报告的发作表现对识别分离性发作的可靠性。
Epilepsy Behav. 2021 Feb;115:107696. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107696. Epub 2021 Jan 1.
2
Objective score from initial interview identifies patients with probable dissociative seizures.初始访谈的客观评分可识别出可能存在分离性发作的患者。
Epilepsy Behav. 2020 Dec;113:107525. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107525. Epub 2020 Nov 13.
3
Development and validation of a screening questionnaire for psychogenic nonepileptic seizures.
临床功能性癫痫发作评分(CFSS):一种供临床医生怀疑功能性癫痫发作的简单算法。
Front Neurol. 2023 Nov 29;14:1295266. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1295266. eCollection 2023.
4
Self-Reported Severity and Causes of Traumatic Brain Injury in Patients With Epileptic or Functional Seizures.癫痫性发作或功能性发作患者创伤性脑损伤的自我报告严重程度及病因
Neurol Clin Pract. 2022 Dec;12(6):e189-e198. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200098.
精神性非癫痫性发作筛查问卷的编制与验证。
Epilepsy Behav. 2020 Nov;112:107482. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107482. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
4
Mortality in patients with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures.心因性非癫痫性发作患者的死亡率。
Neurology. 2020 Aug 11;95(6):e643-e652. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000009855. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
5
Cost-effectiveness of surgery for drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy in the US.美国耐药性颞叶癫痫手术的成本效益。
Neurology. 2020 Sep 8;95(10):e1404-e1416. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000010185. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
6
Cognitive behavioural therapy for adults with dissociative seizures (CODES): a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial.针对患有分离性癫痫的成年人的认知行为疗法(CODES):一项实用的多中心随机对照试验。
Lancet Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;7(6):491-505. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30128-0. Epub 2020 May 20.
7
Psychological and demographic characteristics of 368 patients with dissociative seizures: data from the CODES cohort.368 例分离性发作患者的心理和人口统计学特征:来自 CODES 队列的数据。
Psychol Med. 2021 Oct;51(14):2433-2445. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720001051. Epub 2020 May 11.
8
Reply to: We need a functioning name for PNES: Considering dissociative seizures.回复:我们需要为精神源性非癫痫性发作确定一个实用的名称:考虑解离性癫痫发作。
Epilepsy Behav. 2020 Aug;109:107084. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107084. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
9
Machine learning as a diagnostic decision aid for patients with transient loss of consciousness.机器学习作为短暂意识丧失患者的诊断决策辅助手段。
Neurol Clin Pract. 2020 Apr;10(2):96-105. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000000726.
10
We need a functioning name for PNES: Consider dissociative seizures.我们需要为假性癫痫发作(PNES)确定一个实用的名称:考虑使用分离性癫痫发作。
Epilepsy Behav. 2020 Apr;105:107002. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107002. Epub 2020 Mar 8.