Suppr超能文献

超声、计算机断层扫描和正电子发射断层扫描成像在口腔癌临床颈部淋巴结阴性中的相对价值

Relative value of ultrasound, computed tomography and positron emission tomography imaging in the clinically node-negative neck in oral cancer.

作者信息

Chaukar Devendra, Dandekar Mitali, Kane Shubhada, Arya Supreeta, Purandare Nilendu, Rangarajan Venkatesh, Deshmukh Anuja, Pai Prathamesh, Chaturvedi Pankaj, D'Cruz Anil

机构信息

Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.

Department of Pathology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, India.

出版信息

Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jun;12(2):e332-8. doi: 10.1111/ajco.12255. Epub 2014 Aug 17.

Abstract

AIM

To determine the most accurate noninvasive imaging modality for occult metastasis in clinically node-negative necks in oral squamous cell carcinoma from a granulomatous disease endemic region.

METHOD

Prospective, observational study comparing ultrasound (US), contrast enhanced computed tomography (CECT) and positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT). Level wise assessment of neck nodes with each imaging modality was performed and compared with final histopathology.

RESULTS

Eighty-five necks were evaluated in 70 patients. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the three modalities were 78.9, 68.75 and 73.25% for US, 73.6, 85.4 and 80.2% for CECT, and 81.5, 54.1 and 66.2% for PET-CT, respectively. CECT performed better than US and PET-CT scan particularly in levels IB and II (accuracy of 81.4 and 88.3% for CECT, 73.25 and 79.1% for US, and 68.6 and 68.6% for PET-CT scan, respectively). Concordance with histology was best with CECT (κ = 0.615) followed by US (κ = 0.461) and PET-CT (κ = 0.337).

CONCLUSION

The quest for the most accurate imaging modality in clinically node-negative necks continues. US alone is inadequate. While PET-CT may not be a specific imaging modality in detecting occult cervical nodal metastasis in endemic regions of chronic granulomatous diseases, the performance of PET CECT in this setting remains to be evaluated. CECT scan, routinely used in imaging for primary disease, is fairly accurate in detecting nodal metastasis. However, in early oral cancers that are generally treated without any imaging for the primary tumor, management of the neck will largely depend on clinical judgment.

摘要

目的

确定在肉芽肿病流行地区,用于检测口腔鳞状细胞癌临床颈部淋巴结阴性患者隐匿性转移的最准确无创成像方式。

方法

一项前瞻性观察性研究,比较超声(US)、对比增强计算机断层扫描(CECT)和正电子发射断层扫描-计算机断层扫描(PET-CT)。采用每种成像方式对颈部淋巴结进行分层评估,并与最终组织病理学结果进行比较。

结果

对70例患者的85个颈部进行了评估。三种检查方式的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为:超声为78.9%、68.75%和73.25%;CECT为73.6%、85.4%和80.2%;PET-CT为81.5%、54.1%和66.2%。CECT的表现优于超声和PET-CT扫描,尤其是在IB区和II区(CECT的准确率分别为81.4%和88.3%,超声为73.25%和79.1%,PET-CT扫描为68.6%和68.6%)。与组织学的一致性方面,CECT最佳(κ=0.615),其次是超声(κ=0.461)和PET-CT(κ=0.337)。

结论

对于临床颈部淋巴结阴性患者,寻找最准确成像方式的工作仍在继续。仅靠超声是不够的。虽然在慢性肉芽肿病流行地区,PET-CT在检测隐匿性颈部淋巴结转移方面可能不是一种特异性成像方式,但PET-CECT在这种情况下的表现仍有待评估。常规用于原发疾病成像的CECT扫描在检测淋巴结转移方面相当准确。然而,对于通常在没有对原发肿瘤进行任何成像的情况下进行治疗的早期口腔癌,颈部的处理在很大程度上仍将依赖于临床判断。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验