Suppr超能文献

台湾地区价格调整下全球预算支付方式下的战略供应商行为

Strategic Provider Behavior Under Global Budget Payment with Price Adjustment in Taiwan.

作者信息

Chen Bradley, Fan Victoria Y

机构信息

Program in Health Care Financing, Harvard School of Public Health, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Institute of Public Health, National Yangming University, Taipei, Taiwan.

出版信息

Health Econ. 2015 Nov;24(11):1422-36. doi: 10.1002/hec.3095. Epub 2014 Aug 12.

Abstract

Global budget payment is one of the most effective strategies for cost containment, but its impacts on provider behavior have not been explored in detail. This study examines the theoretical and empirical role of global budget payment on provider behavior. The study proposes that global budget payment with price adjustment is a form of common-pool resources. A two-product game theoretic model is derived, and simulations demonstrate that hospitals are expected to expand service volumes, with an emphasis on products with higher price-marginal cost ratios. Next, the study examines the early effects of Taiwan's global budget payment system using a difference-in-difference strategy and finds that Taiwanese hospitals exhibited such behavior, where the pursuit of individual interests led to an increase in treatment intensities. Furthermore, hospitals significantly increased inpatient service volume for regional hospitals and medical centers. In contrast, local hospitals, particularly for those without teaching status designation, faced a negative impact on service volume, as larger hospitals were better positioned to induce demand and pulled volume away from their smaller counterparts through more profitable services and products such as radiology and pharmaceuticals.

摘要

全球预算支付是成本控制最有效的策略之一,但其对医疗服务提供者行为的影响尚未得到详细探讨。本研究考察了全球预算支付在医疗服务提供者行为方面的理论和实证作用。该研究提出,带有价格调整的全球预算支付是一种公共资源形式。由此推导出一个双产品博弈理论模型,模拟结果表明,医院预计会扩大服务量,尤其侧重于价格-边际成本比率较高的产品。接下来,该研究采用差分策略考察了台湾地区全球预算支付系统的早期效果,发现台湾地区的医院表现出此类行为,即对个人利益的追求导致了治疗强度的增加。此外,地区医院和医学中心的住院服务量显著增加。相比之下,基层医院,特别是那些没有教学资质的医院,服务量受到了负面影响,因为大型医院更有能力诱导需求,并通过放射学和制药等利润更高的服务和产品,从较小的医院吸引患者。

相似文献

5

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
The health financing transition: a conceptual framework and empirical evidence.卫生筹资转型:概念框架与经验证据。
Soc Sci Med. 2014 Mar;105:112-21. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.014. Epub 2014 Jan 22.
5
Revising Medicare's physician fee schedule--much activity, little change.
N Engl J Med. 2007 Mar 22;356(12):1201-3. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp068272.
7
The treadmill effect in a fixed budget system.固定预算系统中的跑步机效应。
J Health Econ. 2006 Jan;25(1):146-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2005.04.004. Epub 2005 Jul 21.
8
Hospital price regulation and expenditure cap policy.医院价格监管与支出上限政策。
J Health Econ. 2005 Jan;24(1):55-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.04.007.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验